Food and Depopulation: Monsanto’s Monopoly (Part 1,2,3+4 of 4)

Cassandra Anderson

Infowars.com
June 8, 2010

Part 1 of 4.

The purpose of this article is to give a brief outline of how the elites, and the Rockefellers in particular, are using food as a weapon.

Food and Depopulation: Rockefeller Family onepixel
Food and Depopulation: Rockefeller Family seedvault

Since the Rockefeller family came to power (especially after gaining a monopoly with Standard Oil) they have manipulated our government into ruining our financial system by way of the Federal Reserve, energy through oil dependency and food with GMOs (Genetically Engineered Organisms).  The intention is to rob us blind and kill us.  It’s time to wake up.

The official name of this program is Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.

It the overarching blueprint for depopulation and total control over America and the rest of the world.  There is no question that Americans are targeted for depopulation: GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) food has saturated American farmlands. GMOs are dangerous and the proliferation of corn crops (used as sweetener, animal feed, processed food, etc) in America is shortening our life spans.(1)  Our water is polluted, containing over 60,000 chemicals, most of which have never been tested for safety.(2)  Our air is toxic, and the US is one of the most targeted areas for chemtrails.(3)  This is just the tip of the iceberg, the things we know about.  The focus of this article is revealing the link between the Rockefellers and their intended use of food as a weapon, which is more powerful than military domination and energy control.

While Agenda 21 was introduced in 1992, the elite collectivists, lead by the Rockefellers, have been pushing population control on America and the world for generations.  In 1992, this depopulation and control policy was modernized and given a name: Agenda 21, or the Agenda for the 21st century.  The premise for depopulation and control is to preserve the environment. One would have to be an idiot to disregard environmental concerns, however, the solutions that Agenda 21 offers fail to address the real issues.  The primary tools that Agenda 21 Sustainable Development uses are global warming lies, water shortages (like the man made drought in California, which also causes food shortages) and the Endangered Species Act (designed to take away private property, which is the base of wealth creation and freedom).(4)

Food control goes hand in hand with population control.  The eugenics (improvement of humans through selective breeding, often using brutal methods like genocide and forced sterilization) program of the Third Reich in Nazi Germany was revealed after WWII.  Obviously, people did not have a high opinion of eugenics, so, according to William Engdahl, author of “Seeds of Destruction”, the Rockefeller strategists shifted their profile to champion the causes of the environment, resource scarcity and overpopulation.(5)  The policy of population control remained, despite the illusion of caring concern- which is simply marketing; the word eugenics has been renamed as “human genetics”.  This scheme for improving their image worked for them before, using “philanthropy” and tax-free foundations, when the Rockefellers became very unpopular following the Ludlow Massacre.

The Ludlow Massacre took place at a Rockefeller owned coal mine in Colorado.  The mines were notoriously unsafe, which caused many deaths and the workers were paid in scrip (currency substitute that is often credit), to be spent at the Rockefeller company stores.  When the workers went on strike, they were evicted from their homes and lived with their families in tent cities.  Then they were provoked through murder, machine gun spray, harassment, etc, in order to goad the workers into violence.(6)  This was used as a pretext to get the National Guard involved; the state militia opened fire on the tent cities, resulting in up to 53 deaths, 13 of whom were women and children.  So, the Rockefellers created a propaganda campaign to polish their tarnished image through tax exempt foundations.  These foundations are hardly philanthropic; they are used to fund the destruction of America (please read this excellent interview transcript by G. Edward Griffin to discover the true nature of tax exempt foundations).(7)

Why do you think Senator Jay Rockefeller is pushing so hard to censor the Internet?(8)

Today, the Rockefellers use coercive population control tactics and food as a weapon through a front organization, CGIAR (Consultative Group on Agricultural Resources) as the Rockefellers are trying to distance themselves from public- just like the Rothschild clan has done.  Engdahl reports that CGIAR operates under the umbrella of the UN World Bank, and its primary focus is the spread of GMO crops.  CGIAR was created by the Rockefellers and the Ford Foundation, along with the UN World Bank in 1971 with $350 million dollars a year in funding.

The Rockefeller’s “Green Revolution”, which was the implementation of new farming methods in developing countries, like Mexico, India and Asia, increased crop yields, but ended in disaster; the program lasted from the 1940’s- 1970’s.(9)  The “Green Revolution”, funded by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations and the US government, was a farming experiment with these results:

•  Hybrid rice was planted that is often sterile in subsequent generations

•  Intensive water usage, which depleted water sources

•  Use of pesticides and herbicides, which causes cancer but made the manufacturers wealthy

•  Use of synthetic (petroleum based) fertilizers that damaged the environment, but created untold wealth for the Rockefeller owned Standard Oil

•  Created a monoculture (only a single crop is grown), which means that the food supply can be destroyed in one season

Bill Gates wants to have a new “Gene Revolution” in Africa.  Bill Gates has teamed with the Rockefellers, Monsanto and the government of Norway in the Doomsday Seed Vault, in which organic seed is stored for some vague anticipated world catastrophe.(10)

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund created the ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) and the Rockefeller Foundation is a major donor.  The ISAAA is involved in promoting proprietary GMO seeds to developing countries.  Its sponsors include Monsanto (USA), Dow AgroSciences (USA), Cargill (USA), Bayer CropScience (Germany), and a mysterious “Anonymous Donor “(USA), and US-AID of the State Department, per William Engdahl.

It is worth mentioning that Robert Deitch’s book, “Hemp: American History Revisited” explains that the Great Depression was not caused by the Wall Street stock market crash of ‘29, but by Prohibition (the 18th Amendment that prohibited alcohol from 1920 until it was repealed in 1933).  Other businesses, besides the production of alcoholic beverages, that used alcohol were ruined.  Deitch claims that the big oil interests, like Rockefeller (Standard Oil) and Mellon  (Gulf Oil) demonized alcohol, not on propagandized moral grounds, but to  eliminate competition.  The automobile industry was in its infancy and they wanted to corner the market on energy, so they devised a plan to knock out the competition of alcohol powered vehicles.

Later, in 1937, after relentless lobbying, they did the same thing with hemp, and through deception and demonization of marijuana, hemp was outlawed.  Hemp contains only miniscule trace amounts of THC (the active agent in marijuana), yet it is considered a ‘controlled substance’.

Hemp is a low maintenance plant that needs no pesticides or herbicides, and can produce oil, paper products, biodegradable plastics, medicine and textiles (it is also a super nutritious food).  Because the Robber Barons (Rockefeller and Mellon- oil, DuPont- chemicals and Hearst- paper) were threatened, they joined together to outlaw hemp.

Hemp was later needed during WWII, so its cultivation was allowed in the US.  Hemp was a threat to the Rockefellers not only because it produces oil, but also because Cannibis has uses as a medicine, thereby threatening their pharmaceutical drug monopoly.  Nelson Rockefeller, as governor of New York, in 1973, established marijuana as a Schedule I narcotic drug, through the “Rockefeller Drug Laws” which had harsh penalties for the possession and sale of drugs (including marijuana) that could result in a sentence of 15 years to life.  As other States followed suit, this became the cornerstone of America’s abysmal ‘War on Drugs’.(11)

California was the first State to defy the federal government in de-criminalizing marijuana for medical use, through the 10th Amendment (States’ rights).  Fourteen other States have followed suit.  California will be vote on marijuana legalization in November; this may pass because the government wants to tax it.  Ironically, in 2006, a bill to allow hemp farming passed both houses of the California legislature, but collectivist Arnold Schwarzenegger, in another act of cowardice, vetoed the bill because he said that marijuana and hemp are indistinguishable under federal law.  Hemp could go a long way toward saving California’s bankrupt economy.

Fifteen other States have introduced or enacted legislation to grow hemp, but they fear the federal Drug Enforcement Agency.(12)

Interestingly, California will have an initiative on the ballot in November to legalize marijuana.  This means that if it passes, anyone can smoke marijuana for any reason, as opposed to limiting it to medical marijuana use.  This is important for 2 reasons; first, it would open the door for hemp cultivation for food, oil, natural plastics, paper, etc.  The second reason this is important is because it would nullify the federal drug law, thus enforcing the Tenth Amendment for state sovereignty.

Thanks to F. William Engdahl, author of “Seeds of Destruction” for all of his fine research and articles.

For more information, pleas visit www.MorphCity.com

1  http://www.theholisticoption.com/Pages/Video_King_Corn_Documentary_219.aspx

2. http://www.naturalnews.com/028638_EPA_water_supply.html

3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD9ezi55mO4&feature=related

4. http://www. MorphCity.com <http://MorphCity.com>

5. http://www.mindfully.org/GE/2005/Geopolitics-GM-Food6mar05.htm

6. http://www.newdemocracyworld.org/Bill-Gates-3.pdf

7. http://www.realityzone.com/hiddenagenda2.html

8. http://www.infowars.com/murder-of-the-internet-and-the-free-market/

9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Revolution

10. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_drug_laws

12. http://www.naturalnews.com/020625_hemp_farming_politics.html

Read more…

________________________________

Part 2 of 4 Cassandra Anderson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, June 10, 2010

A monopoly is exclusive control of a commodity or service that makes it possible to manipulate prices.  This is accomplished through governmental regulations used to enforce the monopoly.  The way to break a monopoly is to remove those laws.  This is simple, but not easy in the case of Monsanto, because the roots extend to international, federal, state, and local government regulations.  Monopoly owners corner a market by taking control of the resource AND preventing others from using the resource.

The famous robber baron JD Rockefeller refined this method of monopolization with Standard Oil; he created a cartel (an agreement between companies to avoid competition) with the companies he could not buy or force out of business through extraordinarily corrupt business practices.  Competition creates a free market; JD Rockefeller is famous for saying, “Competition is a sin.”  Of course, the Rockefellers have an enormous stake in biotechnology and the Rockefeller Foundation funded the biology centers and research that led to the creation of GMOs;  F. William Engdahl’s book, “Seeds of Destruction”, is highly recommended for the complete details.

This article is intended as a brief sketch to explore the expanse of the roots of Monsanto & understand the machinery of a monopoly, therefore, the science and health issues behind GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) will not be covered in detail.  GMOs are created by injecting virus and/ or bacteria into a plant or animal cell, along with the DNA of life forms that would never mate in nature (like spiders and goats). There is extensive proof that GMOs are detrimental to health.(1) Monsanto’s business practices are corrupt- for example, there have been cases where seed sold as non- GMO were actually contaminated.  GMOs are not limited to food; industrial chemicals, plastic and drugs can be grown in plants like corn, and there is an overwhelming chance that you have ingested these chemicals and drugs, if you live in America.(2) Cross pollination is rampant and is an enormous problem, thereby polluting non-GMO farms and endangering America’s food supply.  Most Americans are unaware that up to 75% of their daily diet is comprised of GMO food.

This is all part of the United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development depopulation program (remember that the Rockefellers have overwhelming influence with the UN).  Monsanto promises their seeds are more prolific and can feed more people, but the opposite has often proven to be the truth.  The most shocking part of this is that the USDA co-owns a patent, along with Monsanto, on a gene (the Terminator) that can destroy food and be used as a bioweapon.

Monsanto’s monopoly is firmly entrenched within the US government:

1. *US Patent Office:* this where the problem began, in allowing a patent on life. Monsanto’s seeds are protected under an ‘Intellectual Property’ patent; the seeds are good for one season.  When a farmer buys Monsanto seed, he also signs the Technology Agreement that stipulates he may not collect seed and replant it.  While the farmer is free to plant any type of seed he wishes, the courts have maintained that farmers are not tied to Monsanto seeds in future seasons.  However, it is difficult and costly to stop using Monsanto seed once a farmer has planted it because he may not collect and replant the Monsanto seeds collected after harvest, and must buy all new seeds for the new season.  Even if a farmer, having once planted GMO seed, then wishing to switch back, faces the issue of “volunteers” (seeds in the ground from the previous planting) which appear and Monsanto has aggressively sued farmers for patent infringement.(3)

Monsanto is the GMO leader because it has a proprietary patent on the method for creating GMOs, so other companies pay an exorbitant fee to make GMOs.

Monsanto is now patenting non GMO seed as well; this is essentially a patent on nature.(4)  Monsanto owns over 20,000 patents.

2.. * FDA (US Food & Drug Administration)*: Many people rely on the FDA to determine the safety of food or a product.  The FDA is corrupt, particularly within the realm of GMOs.  The only “testing” for safety that is required is for the GMO producer to submit a self authored report on the new GMO’s safety.  This fraud was accomplished by Michael Taylor, a lawyer who went to work for the FDA and established the “no testing” policy by reasoning that GMOs are “SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT” to food, and food has already been determined to be safe.  However, this is an oxymoron because in order to receive a patent, the new product must be different.  Michael Taylor (second cousin to Tipper Gore) is notorious for his “revolving door” employment within the US government and Monsanto- he was recently chosen by Obama as the Deputy Commissioner for foods in the FDA.(6)

GMO seed companies prohibit any testing of their products, by contract, to their buyers.(7)

The FDA has made it illegal to label GMO foods as containing GMOs, as they are GRAS (generally recognized as safe).  Some companies, like Whole Foods, are starting to label their products as NO GMOs.
3.  *President George HW Bush*, under executive power, mandated the Doctrine of Substantial Equivalence of 1992, the same year that Agenda 21 was introduced.  This policy requires NO health or safety testing before a GMO product is released into the public.(8)

4.  *USDA (United States Department of Agriculture)*: This government body determines whether a plant is safe to grow.  GMOs are unsafe to grow; wind, seeds blown from trucks and insect pollination bring GMO pollen and seeds into non-GMO farmland and contaminate the nearby non-GMO farms.

Outrageously, the USDA co-owns the patent on the “Terminator Gene”, which means that the seeds have been modified to “commit suicide” after one season, and will not germinate if they are planted in a subsequent season.  This technology could potentially wipe out food on the planet in one season.  The US government has been funding GMO research since 1983; William Engdahl has said that this will give the owners control of the food seeds over entire regions and nations, when commercialized. The USDA and the co-owner of the “terminator” patent promised not to commercialize it in 1999, however, in 2001, they signed a commercialization agreement.  Seven years later, *Monsanto bought out the co-owner and is now partnered with the USDA for the “Terminator” patent*.  Food can be used as a weapon.(9)

The USDA has also engaged in illegal dispersal of subsidies to Monsanto as well as giving farmers a break on crop insurance premiums if they used Monsanto seeds, which is tantamount to product endorsement. Remember the USDA is business partners with Monsanto.  This is where your tax dollars are going.  We are paying for our government to poison us.

5.  *EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)*:  The EPA is responsible for determining the safety of GMOs in the environment.  GMOs can withstand more pesticides and herbicides than normal crops, so more of these toxins are used and a resistance to the toxins has occurred.  GMO pollen has been proven to be detrimental to certain insects; many believe that the great bee die- off in the US is a result of large quantities of pesticides sprayed on GMO crops plus, some crops have pesticides contained in their the DNA.  The EPA often relies on the chemical producer for its research and safety testing.(10)

The EPA is a corrupt agency that continually fails to protect public health: there are over 80,000 chemicals used today, but only a few hundred have been tested for safety.(11)

6.  *The US Supreme Court* is an agency of the US government, which has usurped untold power.  Currently, there is a case in the Supreme Court, to uphold a ban on GMO alfalfa, as GMOs often contaminate nearby farms via cross pollination; a decision is expected this month.  Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was an attorney for Monsanto from 1976 to 1979, but he has failed to disqualify himself due to a direct conflict of interest. .
A ban was placed on the GMO alfalfa due to danger of cross contamination (not safety of the food, but whether the plant is safe to grow- the USDA failed to carry out a proper Environmental Impact Study); the prior rulings have been against Monsanto, and this is their 3rd appeal. Justice Scalia has made remarks that contamination isn’t “the end of the world”.  However, it does affect farmers regarding international trade because there are many GMO bans in Europe, and they don’t want GMO crops from the US.  A judgement against contamination and in favor of safety would put the USDA’s lack of ethics in preventing contamination in the news and could negate prior lower court decisions that failed to protect non- GMO farmers from contamination.  And a ruling in favor of food safety could put the USDA in the news again, connecting the dots of collusion because of their refusal to ban GMOs, in order to protect their own patent on the Terminator Gene.  So, given the evidence of governmental complicity in GMO monopolies, incompetence and ignorance, don’t expect the miracle of common sense to prevail in this case.

Incidentally, Elena Kagan, Obama’s candidate for the Supreme Court, sided with Monsanto in the alfalfa case, during the petition period, although it was outside of he jurisdiction as solicitor general.(12)

7.  *State governments* have also contributed to the monopoly by blocking local bans on GMOs.  Mendocino and Marin Counties, in Northern California, banned GMOs in 2004.  California’s Central Valley, the nation’s largest produce provider, did not follow the GMO ban.  Lobbying from GMO seed producers was intense, as the monopoly became threatened. The response was that a number of States enacted pre-emptive laws preventing local governments from declaring bans on GMOs within their jurisdictions.(13)

8.  *Monsanto* has a long history of lying, lobbying, bribing and pressuring government scientists and government officers in order to keep their monopoly in place.(14)  Monsanto has used very dirty business practices to corner the market on seeds.  Within Monsanto contracts there are provisions that mandate the destruction of all Monsanto seeds when a seed company changes ownership: the result is that this makes it very easy for Monsanto buy seed companies cheaply in the bidding process.  Another way that Monsanto has eliminated competition is through withholding non GMO seeds from the market.  They have also undercut their prices, making their cheaper product appear to be a good deal to farmers.  News stories about the detrimental effects of GMOs have also been suppressed, as in the case of some news investigators who got fired from a Fox news investigation over rBHG.

9.  *US DOJ (Department of Justice)* is currently conducting an investigation regarding anti-trust violations (like the concentration of the seed supply being in the possession of 2 companies), but the investigation seems skewed in the favor of Monsanto as farmers are under-represented and the US interest in the GMO monopoly is deeply rooted.  In other words this will be a lightweight investigation.(15)

Maybe the 7 States that are investigating Monsanto’s monopoly on seeds will be more authentic, but I doubt it as DuPont’s complaint against Monsanto accuses them of offering rebates to seed distributors for excluding rival seeds; DuPont offers GMO seeds and is acting in its own interest- this investigation will likely avoid looking into how Monsanto edged out healthy non GMO seeds.(15)

In conclusion, it is undeniable that the our government is deeply complicit in depopulation through food control, especially the USDA’s patent on the Terminator Gene.  Frighteningly, amateur garage laboratory scientists and other hobbyists are pursuing new GMO creations on their own, which could have catastrophic results.(16)  While this option could break Monsanto’s monopoly, it is certainly not the preferred way to go. The solution is to educate your family, educate friends, and especially educating farmers is crucial.  The US government involvement is particularly disturbing, regarding the sterile Terminator Gene and needs to be exposed far and wide.  Please share this information with everyone you know, in order to support the growth of organic and non GMO farming.

Please visit  Cassandra Anderson’s website at www.MorphCity.com<http://www.MorphCity.com> for more information.

1.  http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/GEessays/FDAdocuments.html<http://online.sfsu.edu/%7Erone/GEessays/FDAdocuments.html>
2. http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/solutions/sensible_pharma_crops/protect-our-food-information.html
3. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3HwYzIjhEQAJ:jay.law.ou.edu/faculty/kershen/service_presentations/Intellectual%2520Property%2520Rights%2520in%2520Living%2520Matter.ppt+intellectual+patent+laws+monsanto&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari<http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3HwYzIjhEQAJ:jay.law.ou.edu/faculty/kershen/service_presentations/Intellectual%2520Property%2520Rights%2520in%2520Living%2520Matter.ppt+intellectual+patent+laws+monsanto&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari>
http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/CFSMOnsantovsFarmerReport1.13.05.pdf
4. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/07/Monsantos-Many-Attempts-to-Destroy-All-Seeds-but-Their-Own.aspx
5.  http://www.combat-monsanto.co.uk/spip.php?article234
6.  http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14570<http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14570>
7.  http://www.rense.com/general85/mortaa.htm
8.  http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/Monsanto/monsanto.html
9. http://gmo-journal.com/index.php/2009/10/20/epas-flawed-regulation-of-gmos-examined/
10.  http://www.naturalnews.com/028765_environmental_chemicals_cancer.html
11.  http://www.counterpunch.org/frank05192010.html
12.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism
13. http://www.sott.net/articles/show/206494-Monsanto-The-World-s-Poster-Child-for-Corporate-Manipulation-and-Deceit-Part-2
http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/11593-monsantos-history-of-lies-and-toxicity
14. http://current.com/news/92294418_doj-monsanto-antitrust-probe-just-a-sham.htm
15. http://shatterlimits.com/monsanto-major-producer-of-gm-food-under-investigation-by-seven-u-s-states/
16.  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28390773

Read more…

Cassandra Anderson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Part 3 of 4

Most people think that the United Nations is a noble enterprise and they don’t understand the history and malignant character of the UN.

Christina Aguilera, Drew Barrymore and Sean Penn are probably unaware, even though they are UN Ambassadors to the World Food Program (WFP), that the intent of the UN is to implement one world government (see videos below).  The UN WFP, which spreads GMOs in poor countries, is just one tool used for advancing the goals of Agenda 21, the overarching blueprint for depopulation and total control.

Food and Depopulation: International Takeover by the UN onepixel
world food program Food and Depopulation: International Takeover by the UN onepixel
The WFP is corrupt to its core, as evidenced by a leaked UN document about Somalia which exposed that most of the aid goes to UN workers, Islamic militants and contractors.

The UN grew out of the League of Nations, which withered after Woodrow Wilson ( Edward House’s puppet), failed to convince Congress that international treaties and entangling alliances were good for America.  Later, Rockefeller was able to advance the globalists’ cause and even donated 18 acres of land for the UN headquarters, located in New York.  The Rockefellers have conceived and funded most of the destructive UN programs.

The origin of the food monopoly began with the Rockefeller Dynasty, even before they funded biotech research and industry.(1)  The major GMO seed companies like Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, etc. are based in America and the patent laws that protect their monopoly are American.(2)  Therefore, it should come as little surprise that the forces behind toxic GMOs promote GMOs internationally by way of the United Nations, using American tax dollars.

USAID

USAID (US Agency for International Development) is a an independent federal agency that is concerned with economic growth and advancing US foreign policy and interests, under the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.  The agency is funded by taxpayer money.  These interests are often private companies, like Monsanto, that champion so-called humanitarian aid in the name of the American people, using our tax dollars.  USAID’s humanitarian efforts include imposing GMO seeds on poor nations by way of complex methods that circumvent the laws of poor countries.(3)  Poor countries rarely stand up to the US government directly and are under constant pressure, plus they risk losing financial benefits from the US.  So, these poor and transitional countries sell out their own farmers and the population suffers because GMO crops are unhealthy, GMO crops yields are lower and they foster monopolies, resulting in ongoing dependence.

USAID funds many NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) that carry out USAID’s objectives- here is a list nearly 200 pages long- of the NGOs that are supported by US taxpayers.(4)  It is interesting to note how many of these NGOs are concerned with ‘reproductive rights’, which is a fancy term for eugenics (selective breeding programs, often brutally enforced via forced sterilization and genocide).  Further, USAID entered into a Public- Private Partnership with the Rockefeller Foundation, with the help of Bill Clinton, in order to use investments to “address” social and environmental problems, under the shelter of a tax free organization.(5)  This means that the tax free organization will be able direct ‘impact’ investing which is designed to have an effect on social and environmental problems.  In other words, be on the lookout for large investors using their overwhelming influence upon infrastructures, utilities, sewage systems, water sources, etc, which will likely lead to corporate privatization, and total control in pursuit of the final goals of Agenda 21.

UN WORLD FOOD PROGRAM

The UN WFP (World Food Program) receives most of its funding from USAID.

The WFP is corrupt to its core, as evidenced by a leaked UN document about Somalia which exposed that most of the aid goes to UN workers, Islamic militants and contractors.(6)  Another example is in Ethiopia where only 12% of the food aid was delivered to the intended poverty stricken area.  Additionally, there are more examples of corruption with shipping and trucking fees inflated up to 300% over cost.  Of course, NGOs are deeply complicit in this international scheme of theft and incompetence with zero accountability.

Further, USAID director, Rajiv Shah worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the USDA, is also the director of A Green Revolution in Africa (Gates and Rockefeller funded).  In fact, just last week, Shah said that the UN WFP is creating food systems that will eliminate “humanitarian” food aid over time; a cynic could interpret this as a depopulation plan, consolidation of monopolies and/ or privatization of all resources.  Shah also wants to engage the private sector, which means establishing more PPPs (Public- Private Partnerships) which is the modern mechanism of fascism.(7)(5)

UN collectivists, trying to coerce governments to adopt GMOs, use urgent threats of starvation in poor countries to convince the masses that GMOs are beneficial, when the truth is that they have lower crop yields.  The WFP, pushing GMOs, have exploited Africa’s famine problem by offering GMO seeds as the only aid/ help offered, in a ‘GM or Death’ ultimatum.(8)

UN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

The UN WTO (World Trade Organization) influences tariffs and can impose fines (of hundreds of millions of dollars) on countries when they trade internationally.  While they promote the phrase “free trade”, it is anything but a free market, due to the favorable or unfavorable tariff taxes that the WTO sets.  It fosters monopolies on a grand scale.  It prohibits competition and true free market Capitalism.

F. William Engdahl, author of “Seeds of Destruction”, explains in detail how the Biosafety Protocol, a policy that requiring GMO testing and proof of safety, was undermined.  This was done by forcing a clause into the Biosafety Protocol making its rules subordinate to the UN WTO, using the argument that banning GMOs was a barrier to trade under the WTO rules, because the concern over safety was “unproven”.  Therefore, the burden of proof for the safety of GMOs was removed from Monsanto and the other manufacturers, which leaves consumers, independent farmers and anyone else harmed by GMOs the costly task of proving, scientifically and in court, that GMOs are unsafe.

In a related UN WTO decision, member countries were forbidden from using their own domestic standards for testing, their own food safety laws and their own product standards, claiming that it would set an “unfair barrier to trade”.  Thus, the US government can threaten any government that bans GMOs with violating UN WTO so-called “free trade” rules which have resulted in costly monetary sanctions.  The UN WTO settles international trade disputes in secret.  Please read Engdahl’s excellent article about the WTO for more information on their manipulative policies.(9)

Incidentally, the Director of the WTO is Rufus Yerxa, former employee of the the US government and Monsanto.  Vandana Shiva explains how the WTO imposed trade restrictions on India that limited exports and increased imports, crippling the market and increasing food dependency.  The GMO crops also had lower yields because the seed was imported and not adaptable to India’s farming conditions, which resulted in the suicides of over 200,000 Indian farmers- often from drinking Round Up Ready herbicide.  (Note that we do not agree with Shiva’s assessment of global warming):

UN NAFTA LAW

The UN NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and other WTO agreements were signed introduced into law as “agreements”, instead of treaties.  Under special legislation, NAFTA was passed into law after Congress authorized George W Bush to enter into tariff agreements and bypassed the usual process to make a treaty a law (requiring 2/3 Senate approval).  After Bush entered into the agreements, both houses of Congress passed them into law (a mere 51% majority was needed) on a fast- track.  The Supreme Court, acting as agents of the federal government, denied review of this misdeed.(10)

NAFTA has adversely affected both the US and Mexico because it promoted GMO farming in Mexico, contaminating their corn crops, which is a staple food. US grain and food subsidies were used to lower the prices of US food, which flooded the markets of Mexico, wreaking havoc on them.  The subsidies were bankrolled by the unsuspecting US taxpayers.  Mexico was once food self sufficient, but now it spends 78% of its oil exports to purchase food from the US.  US food exports have decreased as a result of NAFTA because some educated countries reject GMOs.(11)

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

The UN IMF (International Monetary Fund) and UN World Bank are sister agencies that impose harsh conditions and penalties on loans made to governments, resulting in austerity and privatization.   In fact, Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize winner in 2001, former chief economist of the World Bank and formerly one of President Clinton’s economists, exposed the corruption of the UN IMF and World Bank’s practice of keeping developing countries on the loan repayment treadmill, which can lead to harsh measures when the countries fail to repay the loan, instead of allowing a country to go bankrupt and then start over.  In 2003, The IMF actually admitted that its policies have often failed for over 60 years.(12)

The IMF and World Bank, working closely with the WTO, offer financial aid and guarantees to multinational companies to privatize in poor countries.  Even worse, the IMF and World Bank pressure countries, crippled by debt, to privatize utilities and other resources, especially water.  Remember, water is a resource that affects food production.  The US Treasury funds 51% of the World bank.  The UN derives much power from indebted countries and then is able to make outrageous demands upon the debtor nations, that then benefit corporations and individuals like Bill Gates.(13

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS

Codex Alimentarius, the UN program to control food and health products internationally with the goal of HARMonization of food, means that plants, seeds, livestock, farming and how all food is processed is to become uniform.  Of course, GMO food is a major component of this scheme.  Codex Alimentarius is a program to codify food worldwide; it won’t work because there is a lack of consideration for local conditions (local weather, soil conditions, water availability, etc).  This appears to be just plain stupid until one realizes its true intent: depopulation.  Codex Alimentarius operates under two UN agencies: the WHO (World Health Organization), notorious for pushing unsafe vaccines for the H1N1 flu and insider deals with Big Pharma, and the corrupt FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization).  Kevin Miller’s excellent film “We Become Silent” is recommended for more details.(14)

There are several unpopular US “food safety” bills currently under consideration.  By simply reading the short summary of Senate bill S 510, it is clear that the bill is not designed for food safety, but for government (Department of Health and Human Services, the EPA and the CDC) expansion, control and monetary gain.  There are only a few representatives in Washington that are even remotely interested in true food safety and a real solution, which would include the abolition of GMOs, or at least the labeling of GMO food, so that consumers can make an informed choice.  Barack Obama issued an Executive Order on June 10, 2010 that opens the door to Codex Alimentarius.(15)

In conclusion, it is obvious that the time is over-ripe for the US to get out of the UN.  This action would result in the withering of the UN as it is funded primarily by US tax dollars.  The American people will hopefully come to understand that our hard earned money is being used to poison and bankrupt us, and the rest of the world.  Education of the masses is the key, and Americans must exert our power and sovereignty, especially now, with the November elections right around the corner.

Please share this article and information

Please visit Cassandra Anderson’s website at www.MorphCity.com<http://www.MorphCity.com> for more information about the construction of Agenda 21 and how to stop it

1. http://www.infowars.com/food-and-depopulation-rockefeller-family/

2. http://www.infowars.com/food-and-depopulation-monsantos-monopoly/

3. http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=331

4. http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/cross-cutting_programs/private_voluntary_cooperation/volag2009.pdf

http://www.usaid.gov/press/releases/2009/pr090930.html

5. http://www.morphcity.com/agenda-21/ppp

6. http://www.american.com/archive/2010/april/how-corrupt-is-the-world-food-program

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/03/23/food-for-naught.html

7. http://www.wfp.org/stories/usaid-says-wfp-positioned-build-sustainable-food-systems

8. http://www.saynotogmos.org/global_south2.htm

9. http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/World_Trade_Order/world_trade_order.html

10. http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/97-896.pdf

11. http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/ra03/geff16.html

12. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2766706/Stiglitz-rebel-with-a-cause.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2846604/IMF-admits-its-policies-seldom-work.html

13. http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/IMF_WB/Plunder_Profit_IMF_WB.html

http://www.foodfirst.org/en/node/2905

14. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6530770946071047491#

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/36064/

15. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-510&tab=summary

http://survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com/

Read more…

Cassandra Anderson   part 4 of 4
Prison Planet.com
Friday, June 25, 2010

The Food & Depopulation series of articles has been written for people who think that conspiracies are mere theories, that the American government is working in our best interest and that the United Nations is benevolent.  Nothing could be further from the truth; irrefutable proof of this is explained in the previous three articles.  Sharing the truth about food is an exceptionally effective way to wake people up because all people have a personal relationship with food every day. Here are the important points to remember:

1.  The US Department of Agriculture holds a patent on the ‘Terminator’ gene (the seed goes sterile after the first harvest) which has the potential to destroy all plant life on the planet.  This patent is co-owned by Monsanto.

2.  The US Supreme Court has studiously avoided trying any anti-GMO cases, despite the obvious health dangers to people and contamination of farms by cross pollination.  On June 21, 2010 the Supreme Court lifted the nationwide ban growing GMO alfalfa due to its potential to contaminate other farms, pending a Environmental Impact Study (EIS) performed by the US Department of Agriculture.  We predicted 2 weeks ago that the Supreme Court justices would rule in favor of Monsanto as they collect their paychecks from the federal government.  If sanity had prevailed and the ban on polluting GMOs was upheld, the result would have put the USDA’s Terminator gene patent in peril, countless prior court cases would have to be overturned and an avalanche of new lawsuits against Monsanto may have bankrupted the company.  The federal government and Monsanto are so deeply intertwined that we expect the USDA’s EIS, which they expect to finish by next Spring, to allow planting of the contaminating GMO alfalfa.

The Supreme Court refused to hear any of the facts regarding the dangers and past record of contamination; lone dissenter Justice Stevens said, “the district court did not abuse its discretion when, after considering the voluminous record and making the aforementioned findings, it issued the order now before us.”  In other words, Stevens reports that the lower district court’s GMO alfalfa ban was put into place due to voluminous records of contamination to other farms, but this was not taken into consideration by the Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court only considered the national GMO alfalfa ban was “too broad”, without examining the damaging effects of contamination.  This was a slippery move because if they had considered the devastating effects of GMOs, it would have been impossible to argue that they are safe.  And the corrupt USDA will issue its EIS to determine the safety.  The remote potential upside to this is that the jurisdiction is now in the lower courts, which may be more reasonable, but that means more lawsuits and more money.(1)

3.  The United Nations is corrupt to its core and its programs are designed for depopulation, total control and profit.  UN Agenda 21 is the overarching blueprint for depopulation and total control, using the environment and sustainability as the excuse for its policies.

4.  The Rockefeller family has been pursuing control over food for decades, using monopolies and government structures that are funded by taxpayers through complex schemes that they have created to accomplish this goal.

NGO SCAM:

NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations), in the modern definition, spring from the United Nations and act as ‘consultants’ to the UN; no government representatives are allowed as members.  However, NGOs are hardly independent as most of them are funded by governments.  In other words, our tax dollars are paying for our own demise.

This is how the scam works:

• NGOs create policy statements to be adopted by the UN that become international policy.  NGOs then receive money from the UN.

• The UN policies are then are pushed the on national governments who then fund the globalist programs with money from taxes.

• The NGOs then lobby governments and the public to implement the programs, using misguided public pressure that they create by fooling people into believing that UN policies benefit the population (like local government acceptance of global warming regulations. These are based on lies and sold to the public by way of alarmism over environmental catastrophe).  They are dispatched in your community with specific targeted agendas. Local government contracts with organizations like the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) insure local implementation of these globalist objectives.

• US government Advisory Committees are comprised of UN affiliated NGOs, businesses and organizations, while no Advisory Committees represent the American citizens’ interests.

• UN accredited NGOs are well funded and try to discredit populist organizations that oppose them.

UN affiliated NGOs began when eugenicist Julian Huxley created the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), which created a more public spin-off, the WWF (World Wildlife Federation) and a third one called the WRI (World Resources Institute which is a think tank and communication network).  These three NGOs are the driving force and behind the rise in NGO influence around the world.  For full details, you can read the excellent analysis by Maryetta Ables.(2)

NGOs are treacherous and they lie.  While an NGO may take the right action with one hand, the other hand is reaching out and grabbing your liberty by allocating its vast resources to advance the UN agenda.  For example, the IUCN, the center of all UN NGOs, claims on their website that they have a moratorium on further release of GMOs, which makes them seem like they are against GMOs.  GMOs have already contaminated much of the world, so a moratorium on further release of GMOs is a feeble attempt to rid the world of GMOs and NGOs pretend they have no power when more regulations are created to advance the UN agenda.(3)

Instead of taking serious action to combat GMOs, the IUCN allocates their resources toward promoting ‘biodiversity’, (the theft of private property by way of the Endangered Species Act) and global warming, which has been thoroughly discredited.(4)

The WWF keeps a low profile on their website about GMOs, but the WWF does fully endorse GMOs.(5)

Greenpeace is a UN accredited NGO, and like all UN affiliated NGO’s Greenpeace is dedicated to the policies of the UN’s Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.  In order to appear that they are working in the public’s interest, they oppose GMOs and have taken some small actions, like  publicizing the dangers of GMOs and pressuring the Trader Joe’s food chain stores into refusing GMO food for their private label. However, their opposition to GMOs, according to Michael Shaw of www.FreedomAdvocates.org <http://www.FreedomAdvocates.org>, is an example of painting themselves as a public interest group to cover up their true intent, the implementation of Agenda 21.  On their website they endorse global warming lies and energy restrictions that support consolidation of globalist power.  While their website claims that they do not “solicit” contributions from governments or corporations,  there is proof that they have received grants from the Tides Foundation (Rockefeller Foundation is major a contributor), BP Oil and Exxon, but these ‘donors’ are not listed on their website.  In other words, Greenpeace, along with many other environmental NGOs, receive “donations” from globalists and funnel money into other like-minded NGOs and “non-profit” organizations to accomplish Agenda 21.(6)

THE “NON-PROFIT” SCAM:

“Non-Profit” organizations and foundations are anything but not-for-profit!  A more accurate definition is that they are tax exempt. What is it they don’t want you to know?  Many, if not most are funded by governments, NGOs and “philanthropic” foundations.  Tax exempt non-profit 501(c)3 organizations and foundations owe it to the American taxpayer to clearly and publicly disclose who their donors are because they benefit from a tax free status, but it is rare to find this information on their websites or on the Internet.

Michael Shaw pointed out that tax exempt organizations are increasing exponentially in order to capitalize on government funding, however, this makes tax exempt organizations beholden to the government.  Public- Private Partnerships, or the coupling between government and private enterprise is the foundation of fascism. Non profits often fit the political–economic definition of Public-Private Partnership.

“Philanthropic” tax exempt foundations have been working toward the destruction of America for many decades.  In the 1950’s a Congressional investigation into the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie Foundations was conducted with scandalous results, so the information was suppressed. However, G. Edward Griffin was able to obtain an interview with Senator Norman Dodd, one of the lead investigators, on video and in a written transcript available in the footnote below.(7)

Some “non-profit” tax exempt 501(c)3 organizations have been known to engage in controlled opposition.  For example, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) represented farmers in opposition to Monsanto in the Supreme Court GMO alfalfa case and in many other anti-GMO cases.  While we have no way of knowing whether Andrew Kimbrell, the Executive Director of CFS and his brother George (of counsel) performed solid work in opposing Monsanto or whether they sandbagged the endeavor, there are reports that CFS and its parent company have taken in $1.75 million dollars from the John Merck Fund, which has ties to the Rockefeller Family Fund.  Andrew Kimbrell of CFS filed a petition with the EPA to ban colloidal silver which is a natural antibiotic agent with many benefits that competes directly with Merck’s dubious pharmaceutical drugs.  This organization has the appearance of working in the public’s interest, but in a separate action, it has operated in opposition to public benefit.(8)

Further, Andrew Kimbrell reported reported a “success” in the Supreme Court GMO alfalfa ruling.  He said that GMO alfalfa is still illegal to plant.  While this is true today, the USDA has only to complete its Environmental Impact Study in order to approve the seeds.(9)

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Food & Depopulation: Scams and Solutions (Part 4 of 4) 270510banner2

How to check websites of  NGOs, Non-Profits and Foundations for  corruption:

•  Check out which actions they support.  If they champion the global warming hoax, then they are likely to be compromised

Check the organization and the Board of Directors for UN and Rockefeller connections

Look for certain buzz words related to Agenda 21(10)

Beware as almost all major environmental groups are pursuing the objectives of Agenda 21, even when they oppose GMOs.  It is important to do a little bit of research to determine their motives to avoid being fooled.

FOOD SOLUTIONS:

Here are some suggestions to eat healthy food, starve the corporate giants and create self-sufficiency:

Watch this amazing video of a family that turned their yard into a farm and earn money selling produce to restaurants:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEvHVXoNZCE

Eat organically grown or non-GMO food.

Buy and store seeds- organic and heirloom seeds are best.
.
Natural seeds are scarce and could be a good item for investment or barter.  The number of seed companies has dwindled  from approximately 300 down to 100 due to corporate buy-outs (primarily by Monsanto).

Support farmers’ markets and local farms.  Avoid imports to discourage food dependency.  America is resource rich and there is no excuse for becoming dependent.  Also, this limits the power of the WTO.

Plant your own organic garden.  You can use diatomaceous earth instead of pesticides and nets to keep larger pests out of the garden.

If you don’t have a yard, find a neighbor who wants a garden and then share the food.

Join a CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) group that delivers fresh produce to a pick up location in your town; there are many listings for these on the Internet.  This is a good idea because if there is a food shortage, the farmer will be more willing to help someone who supported him.

Remote farming- there is farm in Oregon that leases land, does the farming for you and then ships the food to you.(11)

Watch this video of Shelly Roche of ByteStyle.tv as she reports that the anti-GMO food market is booming:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATFZjS8P2h <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATFZjS8P2h0>

A letter to the Editor of Off the Grid News (6/7/2010), from  from someone who lives in Tasmania describes how he copes with Codex Alimentarius, and reports that Australia was the guinea pig for this UN program starting 6 years ago.  Supplements are not allowed ($60,000 penalty) and food is restricted, so he grows his own in old rainwater tanks to keep animals out and uses composted cow manure.  He says that he gets an unbelievable bounty.  This letter is worth reading because he claims that the food grown in Australia is exported and replaced by cheap imports from China, in addition to food being destroyed to keep prices high.(12)

We recommend obtaining information from people like Scott Tips and Jeffrey Smith for GMO truth.(13)

It is of the utmost importance that farmers become aware of the Monsanto licensing agreement trap, it is crucial that they fully understand that once they plant GMO seed, they will be stuck paying patent royalties even if they don’t use GMO products after the initial planting. America’s farmers must comprehend how Monsanto operates in order to avoid paying infinite royalties; if they buy cheap Monsanto seeds now, they will pay for it dearly later.  Please share these articles with them.

POLITICAL SOLUTIONS:

Bad science must be exposed.  ‘Climategate’ was very successful in revealing global warming lies and motives.  All science attached to political policies should be scrutinized.  The USDA’s upcoming EIS (Environmental Impact Study) is due soon, and must be investigated as there is no way GMOs will be approved unless the  EIS is based on fraudulent science or some other loophole is used.

Remember monopolies are dependent on governmental regulations, so the way to break a monopoly is to remove the regulations.

Beware of all NGOs and so-called “non-profit” organizations.  If they want your support, they should provide financial information readily and you can research them online.  The secret scams and motives must be exposed.

With the November elections coming up, it is of vital importance to choose government officials wisely and to avoid being fooled by the Right/ Left paradigm.  State and local governments are very powerful and you have more influence with them.  Look for freedom candidates with Constitutional values and who oppose GMOs, Agenda 21, the United Nations and the globalist consolidation of power.

Share this information with everyone you know and create a voting coalition that includes citizens and businesses, especially at state and local levels.  Word-of-mouth marketing is the more effective than anything else (even TV), so please share this information, especially candidates who may be unaware of Agenda 21.

Start locally and expand upward in securing freedom.  The federal government is remote, but state and local officials are more accessible. Consider running for office.  Support the Tenth Amendment and State sovereignty.  Support local bans on planting GMO crops in your area.

You can visit Michael Shaw’s website at www.FreedomAdvocates.org <http://www.FreedomAdvocates.org> for more information on securing liberty at a local level and for understanding the tentacles of Agenda 21 Sustainable  Development.  His site is a great place to find out how to take action.

Please visit Cassandra Anderson’s website at www.MorphCity.com <http://www.MorphCity.com> to find the prior three articles on ‘Food & Depopulation’ and future articles about solutions.

Sources:

1.  http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/06/21/21greenwire-supreme-court-lifts-ban-on-planting-gm-alfalfa-57894.html

2.  http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/illegitimate_government/abusing_the_system_through_ngos_and_csos_20100405403/

3.  http://www.iucn.org/about/work/initiatives/biotechnology/gmos/

4.  http://www.morphcity.com/agenda-21/environment/esa

http://www.morphcity.com/agenda-21/environment/global-warming
5.  http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2010/03/17/freeze-your-footprint-agribiz-told/

6.  http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/who-funds-the-radical-left-in-america/

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Gulf%20Oil%20Spill.pdf

http://www.policestateplanning.com/id52.htm

7.  http://www.realityzone.com/hiddenagenda2.html

8.  http://www.naturalnews.com/027186_silver_Merck_colloidal_silver.html

http://www.zimbio.com/Administrator+Stephen+Johnson/articles/QEsZOW_AKmZ/Colloidal+Silver+War+Heats+Up+Enviro+Group

http://www.undueinfluence.com/rockefeller_family_fund.htm

http://activistcash.com/foundation.cfm/did/138

9.  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-kimbrell/supreme-court-case-a-defe_b_620087.html

10. http://www.morphcity.com/agenda-21/definitions

11. https://myorganicacres.com/

12. http://offthegridnews.com/letter-to-the-editor-june-7/

13. http://www.thenhf.com/health_freedom_news_12.htm

http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/Home/index.cfm

Read more…

About these ads

About this entry