11 Articles On Agenda 21

The Depopulation Agenda For a New World Order Agenda 21


September 17th, 2014

(TheTruthMovement) – For those that think the world is over populated due to food and energy shortages, you need to understand that the multi-national corporations create these shortages by forcing farmers not to grow, limiting development of new technologies etc., all to manipulate prices for their own gain.


Sunday, November 3, 2013

Agenda 21: Blueprint for a NWO Takeover

James White
Activist PostBy now, you have probably heard about the UN directed intrusion into your life known as Agenda 21. Many writers, with greater skills than mine, have explored the true nature of what amounts to essentially a global takeover. It seems that evil has surrounded us. In the video below, produced by my good friend Kevin Martin from Mountain View Productions, Dan Happel covers Agenda 21 from its roots, all the way to its logical conclusion…the elimination of people. We are truly in a battle for our lives, and that’s not hyperbole. Please take the time to watch this video and pass it along…

James White writes for Northwest Liberty News – “Picking the Lock on The Shackles of Tyranny”


Agenda 21 = Death


July 1st, 2014

U.N.’s urban planning program turns the population into mere serfs who are easily controlled by the government

(Infowars) – Signed in 1992 by multiple nations, including the United States, the United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development program is an urban planning “action plan” which calls for government to eventually take control of all land use without leaving any decision making in the hands of private property owners.

The overall intent of Agenda 21, which can be best described as neo-feudalism, is to expand government power at the expense of individual liberties by making the population more dependent on city infrastructure controlled by the government.

Some of the current urban planning trends of Agenda 21 include but are not limited to:

– The closure of rural land for public use and the erosion of rural property ownership

– The development of “multi-use” condos with the first floor designated for businesses catering to the tenants above, encouraging condo dwellers to remain close to home much like serfs from the Middle Ages

– The purposeful lack of easy freeway access in cities which similarly ensures that residents never venture far from their neighborhoods

– The construction of expensive and inefficient public rail systems in cities in order to increase centralized government control while also reducing – and even outright banning – the use of private transportation such as cars

– The accelerated implementation of toll roads, especially toll roads that discourage driving by increasing prices for traveling alone or for driving in “congested” areas

– Utilities monitored by “Smart Meters” which can be controlled – and shut off – remotely by public utility companies

While Agenda 21 proponents constantly suggest that the program is simply “voluntary,” this is a moot point when so many American cities are already implementing Agenda 21 which clearly benefits the government at the expense of its citizens.

Source: Infowars


Monday, May 12, 2014

Rosa Koire Discusses “The Green Mask” of Agenda 21

Behind the Green Mask

Activist Post

Rosa Koire has become one of the most articulate voices exposing the United Nations sustainable development plan known as Agenda 21.

In this interview with Brian Engelman she discusses the bullet points of the plan itself, what to look for in your own community as signs of Agenda 21 infiltration, and the essential difference between personal sustainability and the Agenda 21 definition.

We strongly encourage you to read her book Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21. It is a concise 170 pages covering the history of the plan and how it has expanded into current events. It is also an essential “blueprint for keeping your freedom.”


Monday, April 21, 2014

Agenda 21: Food Is The New Gold. Land Is The New Oil.

Lizzie Bennett
Activist PostOver the last decade world grain reserves have fallen by at least a third and that decline looks set to continue. For the last half of the 20th century overproduction was the order of the day. Huge grain surpluses, butter mountains and milk lakes dominated the news.

During this period the United States had a farm programme where land lay idle to prevent even more surpluses, this provided a cushion against shortages, the land could be planted up if the surpluses fell to levels considered to be too low. In the UK land was left fallow and green manured to enrich it for the following season. The crops were rotated and the harvests were generally very good. In addition there was the carryover: The amount of grain left in the massive storage silos at the time the next crop is harvested. Other western nations had similar systems.

1965 is a good year to show how the system cushioned against disaster.

In 1965 the Monsoon in India failed. The United states shipped a full fifth of its grain harvest to India which averted a potential famine. Due to the amount of surplus in store the incident had a minimal effect on grain prices on the world markets.

There were occasional spikes during the period of 1950-2000, but the effects on world prices were a short-lived thing. The weather was usually to blame and after a bit of a ‘blip’ everything settled down when the amount of idled land and the amount of food commodities in store were announced.

In 1950 the world had a population of 2.5 billion souls. By 1986 world demand for grain was rising rapidly due to an ever-increasing population and the prices were starting to rise. In an effort to keep a surplus and to reduce or at least to stabilise the prices, the land idling programmes were reduced in both the United States and the UK, with other countries following suit until by 1990 most agricultural land that could be farmed was farmed.

It was in the ’80s that someone, somewhere decided that biofuel was the way of the future. The global warming con artists that had infiltrated every layer of government decided that biofuel was the answer, that clean, green fuels would stop global warming in its tracks…well, according to what they say now that wasn’t very effective, the Earth is apparently still warming. These ‘experts’ didn’t look at the global picture.

They never considered that the ever-growing global population would require more and more food and that more and more arable land across the world would be given over to the growing of biofuel crops.

When realization finally dawned that food production could not keep pace something had to be done, a wide-ranging plan was formulated to sell sustainability and global warming, which was now starting to be referred to as climate change, to the masses. Agenda 21 was born.

Agenda 21 basically puts the environment above the inhabitants of this planet. In order to preserve the habitat of insects and small animals nobody has ever heard of, certain regions cannot be farmed in case a moth finds itself out of a home. The scope of Agenda 21 is massive, and it affects every facet of our lives. Even those of us who refuse to comply with the policies of the United Nations are affected by the rules and regulations of the plan.

It affects our choices on a daily basis. It affects the transport we use, the homes we live in, the kind of heating we use, the clothes we wear and the food we eat.

When Maurice Strong, then Secretary-General of the United Nations Earth summit introduced Agenda 21 20 years ago He said:

“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, the use of fossil fuels, electrical appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning and suburban housing — are not sustainable.”

At this point the war on carbon dioxide started. Interestingly carbon dioxide is what humans breathe out. Every breath we take in, is followed by a breath out, from birth to death respiration adds to the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Can we assume therefore that this is what is meant by anthropogenic global warming?

Does the man-made global warming they refer to constantly actually include breathing as a cause of pollution alongside factory output?

The United Nations, pushing its quest for a One World government fully endorse the ethos of flora and fauna over people. In fact, if they can reduce the amount of people along the way they will be exceedingly happy about it. What better way to do that than to have ‘naturally occurring famines’ that cannot be pinned on the governments of the world or on the United Nations.

Now although we are used to seeing famines in Africa I think that the trend is about to change. The peoples of Africa have a much smaller carbon footprint than we do here in the West, and for that reason a famine in the West would reduce the emissions that come from our busy, carbon-fueled lifestyles far more readily than wiping out the entire African sub-continent.

We are also less malleable than those who have to rely on foreign aid for even their basic foodstuffs. We are more likely to cause trouble, to fight, riot and revolt if our kids are not fed. Our governments know this, and in the United States they stockpile ammunition so that when the time comes they can deal with the situation.

Here in the UK there is anecdotal evidence form serving and ex-police officers, that the government does the same, but they are far less public about it. Trauma and major incident teams across the UK that used to train for multiple car pile ups and train crashes now train for civil unrest and riots as well as the more usual stuff. They practice for dirty bombs and biohazard threats, things the government says we are facing from enemies unknown.

The pieces of the puzzle are little by little falling into place. Agenda 21 is advancing rapidly.

  • We are being corralled into smaller and smaller homes that have smaller and smaller gardens.
  • Legislation and ordinances prevent many from saving God-given rainwater on their own property.
  • Ornamental flowers and lawns are to be planted instead of food we can eat in some US states.
  • Health giving raw foods are increasingly difficult to come by, especially for those in towns and cities.
  • We are discouraged from growing our own food from tried and tested heirloom seeds which are increasingly regulated.
  • Global food security is worsening with each passing year and nothing is done to address the problem.
  • Regardless of the government figures decent jobs are becoming harder to find and as a result we are rapidly moving towards the time where we will not be able to afford to feed our families.
  • Our just in time food supply chain relies on increasingly decrepit infrastructure that will fail sooner rather than later.
  • Carbon caps are seeing massive amounts of power stations closing down which even according to energy industry experts is liable to lead to blackouts.

Food really is set to become the new gold and land the new oil because without them we are done for. We have to turn back to the old ways of producing enough to look after our families. Our children need to be taught how to grow produce, how to fix things, build things and generally become more self-sufficient.

Those who do well will not be those people with fancy degrees from Ivy League universities. Those who do well will be those who can make things that are needed, those who can grow food, those who turn their hand to many things. I feel confident in my view that an Honours degree in media studies is not going to be worth a damn.

Regardless of the space you have, and the conditions you have, I urge you to look into what you can grow for yourself. Think laterally, think vertically, whatever you have can be utilized in one way or another. Every single mouthful you grow you are one mouthful nearer self-sufficiency and one mouthful further away from famine …famine that is being systematically induced by the global elite and their failure to act in any way, shape or form to prevent it.



Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

Michael Snyder
Activist PostWhy is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing more land? After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states. Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more?

Well, the truth is that this all becomes much clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing. It is commonly known as Agenda 21, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy. Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”. In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors. The rest of the planet will be left to nature. To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.

So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg. The reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.

For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000 privately-held acresalong the Texas/Oklahoma border…

After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.

Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.

“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”

Needless to say, officials down in Texas are not pleased about this. In fact, just check out what the attorney general of Texas is saying

Gen. Abbott sent a strongly-worded letter to BLM Director Neil Kornze, asking for answers to a series of questions related to the potential land grab.

“I am deeply concerned about the notion that the Bureau of Land Management believes the federal government has the authority to swoop in and take land that has been owned and cultivated by Texas landowners for generations,” General Abbott wrote. “The BLM’s newly asserted claims to land along the Red River threaten to upset long-settled private property rights and undermine fundamental principles—including the rule of law—that form the foundation of our democracy. Yet, the BLM has failed to disclose either its full intentions or the legal justification for its proposed actions. Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a bureaucratic black box.”

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, General Abbott said, “This is the latest line of attack by the Obama Administration where it seems like they have a complete disregard for the rule of law in this country …And now they’ve crossed the line quite literally by coming into the State of Texas and trying to claim Texas land as federal land. And, as the Attorney General of Texas I am not going to allow this.”

Does the federal government actually need more land?

As I mentioned above, the feds already own more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states

  1. Nevada: 84.5 percent
  2. Alaska: 69.1 percent
  3. Utah: 57.4 percent
  4. Oregon: 53.1 percent
  5. Idaho: 50.2 percent
  6. Arizona: 48.1 percent
  7. California: 45.3 percent
  8. Wyoming: 42.4 percent
  9. New Mexico: 41.8 percent

The federal government does not need more land. But there is an obsession to grab more so that the dictates of Agenda 21 can be implemented.

The map that I have posted below is a simulation of what the endgame of Agenda 21 might look like. If these radical environmentalists get their way, the only areas that will be allocated for normal human use will be the areas in green…

If you do not go along with the “sustainable development” agenda, you risk being labeled a “threat” to be dealt with.

For example, Senator Harry Reid has used the label “domestic terrorists” to describe those that showed up to support Cliven Bundy at his ranch.

Reid could have used lots of other labels. But he specifically chose to call them terrorists. And considering what the law allows the feds to do to “terrorists”, that is quite chilling.

And don’t think that if you just stay quiet that you won’t get labeled as a “terrorist”. In fact, there is a very good chance that you already fit several government criteria for being a terrorist. Just check out the list below. It comes from my previous article entitled “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“…

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation areseparate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of theenvironment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

Do any of those criteria apply to you?

If so, then you are a “potential terrorist” according to the U.S. government.

We live at a time when the federal government is becoming increasingly oppressive. Just consider the following excerpt from a recent article by John W. Whitehead

It’s not just the Cliven Bundys of the world who are being dealt with in this manner. Don Miller, a 91-year-old antiques collector, recently had his Indiana home raided by the FBI, ostensibly because it might be in the nation’s best interest if the rare and valuable antiques and artifacts Miller had collected over the course of 80 years were cared for by the government. Such tactics carried out by anyone other than the government would be considered grand larceny, and yet the government gets a free pass.

In the same way, the government insists it can carry out all manner of surveillance on us—listen in on our phone calls, read our emails and text messages, track our movements, photograph our license plates, even enter our biometric information into DNA databases—but those who dare to return the favor, even a little, by filming potential police misconduct, get roughed up by the police, arrested, charged with violating various and sundry crimes.

This was not what our founders intended.

Our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day, and most Americans don’t even seem to care.

In the end, we will pay a great price for our apathy.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.


The Indoctrination Begins: The Agenda 21 Biased UK Government Suggests 10 Hours a Day School For Children From TWO Years Old

Lizzie Bennett 

Underground Medic
April 4, 2014

The pompous Chief Inspector of schools Sir Michael Wilshaw has recommended that children in the UK start school at TWO years old.

At two many kids have not finished teething, many are not toilet trained and most still fall asleep at some point during the day. To suggest that babies should be enrolled in school is the most ridiculous thing I have heard in a long time, but from a government perspective it makes perfect sense.

He proposes that more schools should open for extended hours and that eventually all children should be attending school for ten hours a day for a minimum five days a week.

There are laws that prevent adults working more than 48 hours a week yet he wants children to be in school for at least 50 hours a week.

Getting children into the ‘system’ at two years old would ensure that they are well prepared for a life of government slavery. Repeatedly hearing about things they cannot understand is a form of brainwashing that would ensure they trot out the ‘company line’ as they grow older and move forward with their lives. His constant emphasis on ‘poorer children’ is worrying. It ties the socioeconomic group of the child’s family to a presumed lack of ability.

Couple this with a government that makes it very difficult for parents to home school and you get a clear view of the agenda. The government is attempting to raise British toddlers for 50 hours of their waking week

The British education system is a target led system. Huge amounts of energy and money is spent on testing children from a very young age. School who fail to get their pupils to required levels are taken over by the government and ‘super heads’, government appointed leaders are put in place to turn the school around and make sure that the pupils reach the required levels.

Like all systems that are based on numbers it is open to abuse and those abuses are obvious to anyone that looks closely at what is happening.


  • The most able pupils are held back and entered for exams one level below their ability to bolster the number of pupils getting top marks.


  • Turning up for school on test days is incentivised with ‘treats’ for the kids as non-attenders reduce percentage points in the tables.


  • Very able children are used as free teaching assistants for the other kids. Complaining parents are told it teaches the able kids altruism via helping others and the less able kids often respond better to other kids. This also prevents them having to up the level of work for the more able children, something the system discourages.


  • Many children who are average are given a PEP…Personal Education Plan. This means that they qualify for extra help, and the school gets extra cash for this. Schools with lots of kids on a PEP are not expected to have such high league scores as schools with fewer kids requiring extra help.


  • Teaching standards vary so widely it is common to move home to be near a decent school. Catchment areas mean if you live beyond a given distance from the school gates you cannot apply to that school. This means more affluent parents get their kids into better schools. Those children who show a lack of ability will get more attention than they would at a bad school, this moves them up the league tables.


Putting babies in school is not going to alter any of these things, but what it will do indoctrinate our babies into the state mentality at an even younger age. You can pretty much push any agenda you like on kids of that age. This group will be heading towards ‘cannon fodder’ military positions, that group will be civil servants. How about brainwashing a certain number of kids that reproduction is not a good idea. The world is over-crowded enough already according to the powers that be.

I will leave you with Sir Michaels words on his televised address:

‘ By starting young we have the ability to shape a child’s future”

The possibilities are endless.


Orwell’s Dystopic Nightmare Comes True: Agenda 21 Smart Cities Are Here!

Our brave new world starts with these brave new cities.

So-called smart cities aren’t just some far off futuristic abstract twinkle in the New World Order’s eye…these are being built right now.

Think privacy and freedom are limited commodities now? Try having either of those things living in a smart city control grid where everything you do is tracked, traced, chipped and monitored 24 hours a day.

Masdar City: ‘City of the Future’

Currently being built in Abu Dhabi at a price tag of $22 billion, Masdar (which means “the source”) is a six-kilometer walled smart city shaped like two squares that resemble The Borg’s Unicomplex from the sci-fi TV show Star Trek. Set for a target population of 50,000 people, the city promises to be carbon emission-free with 100% renewable energy. Traditional cars are completely out; while walking, biking and mass transit are encouraged. Futuristic driverless ‘personal rapid transit’ (PRT) pod cars are being considered, but are apparently quite costly. The tiny cars look like a smaller version of the little electronic cars featured in the 1980s film Total Recall.

As a research and testing ground for smart technologies, The National reported“The officials running Masdar’s power grid will have access to detailed data on how energy is being used at any given moment and will have the means to directly moderate high rates of consumptionto balance supply with demand.” [emphasis added]

Sensometrix SA – a Geneva-based company and leader in next generation biometric technology with products including “SensoBrain” and the eerie biometric slogan “Your hand is the future” – will work with Masdar to continue developing the company’s security technologies such as identity access management.

The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) headquarters is set to reside in Masdar as well. After the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) signed on to the project in 2010, Hillary Clinton spoke at The Masdar Institute, remarking, “the partnership that we have established between the United States and Abu Dhabi around renewable energy and climate change and sustainable development that takes advantage of human capital is one of the most important partnerships for the future that we could be pursuing.” Clinton also noted the work in Masdar is “in the interest of global progress”.

While truly sustainable, renewable green energy sources are a positive thing on the surface, the flip side to this community is that everything will be wired into a top-to-bottom, completely controlled smart grid. As experimental technologies are tested out over there, the U.S. deal through the DOE ensures these technologies will be “shared” (or someday imposed?) over here.

Considering the rise of these smart cities, NY Times Nicolai Ouroussoff wrote,“What Masdar really represents, in fact, is the crystallization of another global phenomenon: the growing division of the world into refined, high-end enclaves and vast formless ghettos where issues like sustainability have little immediate relevance.”

The city was set for 2016 completion, but several delays, including dust storms that incapacitated the solar panels, have set Masdar back to a potential 2020 end date.

Songdo International Business District: A ‘City in a Box’

The 100 million square foot Songdo, a $40 billion project by Gale International and Morgan Stanley Real Estate, has been dubbed the “City in a Box,” and is set for completion by 2015. Smart Data Collective.com reports that Songdo will be completely wired, with microchips and/or wireless sensors in practically everything from houses to cars to children who will wear tracking bracelets just in case they get lost. TelePresence screens will adorn all businesses and shops. Even the garbage will offer the city’s central monitoring unit real-time data for instant analysis via microchip cards. As if the ubiquitous sensors and microchips weren’t enough, everything in Songdo will also be monitored via CCTV cameras as well.

“The data will provide valuable insights in how people work, live and think within the smart city,”wrote Mark van Rijmenam of Smart Data Collective. [emphasis added]

Smart Grid, Stupid Implications

At first, giving real-time data on everything you do from the utilities you use to the garbage you throw away to a giant computer to help regulate resources and waste might sound helpful. Leave your water running? No worries, a computer can send a signal to the main control hub to shut it off for you. But as David Sasaki points out, smart cities could lead to dumb citizens: There is a real risk that as our lives become more automated we become more like automatons. We will follow the guidance of our smart phones without reflecting on how we live our lives, and how we engage in our communities.” [emphasis added]

Sasaki’s comment recalls the instance of Japanese tourists driving their car into an Australian bay because they followed orders from their GPS over their own eyeballs.

Beyond that, while Sasaki notes that citizens could be given tax breaks, for example, if they reduce their water consumption, the same hand that can give can also take away by penalizing those in smart cities who use what might be considered too much of any resource – a determination that could easily adjust over time to become even more restrictive.

Ever since 9/11 in America, we’ve seen a government that has completely abandoned the Constitution with undeclared drone wars that lack any form of due process; the declaration of the homeland as a battlefield and the ability to detain and disappear citizens with the National Defense Authorization Act; unprecedented expansion of the National Security Administration big brother surveillance state; the continual militarization of our police and further expansion of the Transportation Security Administration; and unfair targeting practices of certain political groups considered oppositional to the president’s agenda by the Internal Revenue Service just to name a few.

Smart grid cities have the potential to bring some really wonderful alternative energy sources to the table, but with the power balance shifted into all the wrong hands, these cities amount to little more than glorified electronic concentration camps with trendy façades that play on “green guilt”.

To put tyrannical governments in control of a network of these electronic concentration camps makes George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984 look like a Sunday afternoon at a preschool playground.


Agenda 21: The Real Hunger Games


“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”

James Paul Warburg – Statement before U.S. Senate, Feb 7, 1950

Being implemented by the United Nations, Agenda 21 is a plan of action meant to promote “sustainable development” going back as far as 1987 but was openly conceived in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It was signed into place in 1992 by president George H. W. Bush at the Rio Accords on behalf of the United States. The UN is the vehicle being used to solidify its existence internationally. In 1993 president Bill Clinton signed an executive order to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development with “sustainable development” as the center feature of federal policy. Bypassing Congress and instilling a silent and progressive move towards collectivism without protest or even acknowledgment by the majority of the citizens.

UNCED also known as the UN Earth Summit, was organized by Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong who is a self confessed socialist. Strong is also the Secretary General of UNCED who is now living in Communist China as an advisor to the Chinese government on economic policies and suggests International Trade Agreements. A Club of Rome member, he has also propagated the ‘global warming’ movement with the help of Al Gore.

After the “fall” of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev who is also a Club of Rome member; was moved with the help of president George H.W. Bush to the military Presidio in San Francisco. Gorbachev was then given money by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations to create the Gorbachev Foundation which has parented the Green Cross, allegedly one of the most respected environmental organizations on the planet. Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice Strong joined forces and each co-chaired the Earth Charter Initiative in 1997 for “sustainability” and have been implementing Agenda 21 with their charter as the main focal point since its birth.

The terms “sustainable”, “smart-growth”, “high-density” and “biodiversity” are words that have been thrown around quite a bit by the UN and cooperating governments, but these terms are not what they seem. Agenda 21 intends to strip individual priorities and rights into “community” priorities. Priorities for the interest of the community alone, there are no individual rights to conflict with this system once in place.

What exactly is sustainable? A population under 1 billion which can be read on page 716 of the book Eco Science co-authored by president Obama’s current “science czar” John Holdren is apparently “sustainable”. The following was also the conclusion established by theUN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report, their goal was to find what was not “sustainable” …

“Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.”

Agenda 21 plans to manifest global collectivism as the main route of control and erosion of freedoms.  The plans which have been exposed by some in the Republican party call for:

Governments to eliminate all traces of private land ownership and relocation to pre-determined urban areas where private transportation would be illegalized a map of the United States under Agenda 21, a redistribution of wealth, elimination of single family homes, the state as the new head of the family and a restructuring of the family unit, an end to free market in exchange for Public Private Partnerships (PPP) which are nothing more than government sponsored monopolies, an elimination of national sovereignty (apparently it’s a “social injustice”), and the state assigning jobs as well as raising all children.

If you want to confirm this you can read it all yourself in their own documents.

This quote by Harvey Ruvin, the Vice Chairman of the ICLEI sums the attitude up appropriately …

“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.”

Agenda 21 is being implemented by assistance groups like the Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) in every town and state in the nation, but understand this is also being executed globally. So far 600 towns in the United States have given in mostly unknowingly; over 178 countries have also signed onto Agenda 21 and it is now being implemented.

The UN’s own constitution says one can exercise freedoms and rights as long as they don’t contradict the UN, despite the fact the UN has many socialists and communists in prominent positions of power.

Agenda 21 also is intended to be tied into the America 2050 Project.  The America 2050 Project is a non-profit organization that intends to have every person in America living in what they call, ‘megaregions’ that will be connected with bullet trains by the year 2050.

Below is a picture of Panem, from the Hunger Games trilogy …



Above is a picture of the ‘megaregions’ of the America 2050 project.

I feel that this is all being coordinated, and the only way to kill this entire plan is through rooting out those who are supporting this in your local councils. The ICLEI website has a list of all its members. This is being implemented by the day at a more rapid pace, and only information, awareness, and activism can stop this trojan horse from being implemented.

Alec Cope

We Are Change


Sunday, December 1, 2013

The Agenda 21 Enslavement of Colorado

Dave Hodges
Activist PostThe Koch brothers, Pat Stryker, Governor Hickenlooper and many of the Colorado Front Range mayors are all spearheading a movement to enslave the people of Colorado under the dictates of the United Nations created and inspired Agenda 21. Colorado, along with a 15 county area in Northern California and Southern Oregon comprise the beta test for Agenda 21 control over our most precious resources, namely, our water and our farmland.

The Koch Brothers Spearhead the Agenda 21 Takeover of Colorado

The Koch brothers have accomplished nothing. The brothers inherited their immense wealth from their father, Soviet oilman Fred Koch. Yet, these entitled Koch brothers feel that should have the right to dictate to everyone else how they should live.

Stalin actually brought in Fred Koch in order to develop the Soviet Union’s oil industry and now the sins of the father are being visited upon Fred’s sons as they are bringing a virulent form of communism to Colorado.

Koch Industries is the second largest corporation in the United States and, true to form, they have no scruples. The Koch brothers are so corrupt that have been caught stealing oil from protected Indian lands. This should be a hint to the people of Colorado as to what lies in their immediate future.

The Koch brothers espouse the Agenda 21 belief that you do not control your wealth, land, food, water and air; the state does on behalf of the corporations that they serve. For example, the Koch brothers are attacking social security. They have spent $29 million dollars to put forth the propaganda that social security is broke. It is only broke because Congress keeps raiding the funds. The Koch brothers want the retirement age to go to 70 years of age. They want to get their greedy hands on social security so that can invest the funds on Wall Street, thus risking everyone’s social security retirement funds.

Colorado Climate Project

The Rocky Mountain Climate Organization (RMCO) launched the Colorado Climate Project, to bring Coloradans together to reduce the state’s contribution and vulnerability to a changed climate. In the process of enforcing their Agenda 21 inspired policies, Colorado’s farmers and ranchers are under attack. Click here to read the Project’s mission statement. The project followed the model established by several state governments, including those in Arizona, New Mexico, and Montana, but was the first such project undertaken as a private initiative. Click here to learn more about the process the Project followed, including the role of the Climate Action Panel.

Project Directors

RMCO’s project directors appointed the members of the Climate Action Panel, received its final report, and serve as key public spokespersons about the Colorado Climate Project and its recommendations. The project directors are:

  • John Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado
  • Steve Burkholder, mayor of Lakewood
  • Doug Hutchinson, mayor of Fort Collins
  • Tom Long, Summit County Commissioner
  • Matt Baker, director of Environment Colorado
  • Tom Clark, executive vice president of the Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation
  • Former U.S. Senator Gary Hart, the Wirth Chair Professor at the University of Colorado-Denver
  • Gail Klapper, director of the Colorado Forum
  • Pat Vincent, president of the Public Service Company of Colorado (an Xcel Energy company).
  • Al Yates, former president of Colorado State University

Project Sponsors

The principal sponsors of the Agenda 21 takeover of Colorado includes the Denver Water Board, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Pat Stryker, the City of Aspen, BP America, the Koch brothers and the Rockefeller Family Fund.

Because of the Colorado Climate Change and theirunwarranted influence, Colorado farmers are losing more and more of their farmland. The State Legislature and the Colorado Supreme Court are forcing Colorado farmers to forsake the use of well water in the irrigation of their crops during a period of prolonged drought. They have ordered the shutdown of 440 wells. Colorado farm land is drying up, crop yield is down and many farmers are facing ruination. This is classic Agenda 21 in which the only ones who should be able to farm in rural areas are the large corporate farms and the government. Under this group it is illegal to trap rain water, reuse irrigation water and 50% of all farmland cannot be tilled under their proposals. We are talking about the complete destruction of Colorado farming and the absolute installment of Agenda 21 policies in the state.

Colorado Gun Confiscation

Colorado is also the site of some of the most contentious gun control legislation in the country. These same forces are going after the guns of Colorado residents. Two state legislators have already been recalled and removed from office for supporting the anti-Second Amendment forces of these Agenda 21 groups.

Senator Evie Hudak has been one of the principals trying to ban guns in Colorado. Subsequently there have been efforts to recall this third anti-gun politician. Rather than face a recall election, Hudak abruptly resigned. Hudak is a piece of work. She is despised by Second Amendment supporters for having callously dismissed the testimony of a rape survivor during a legislative hearing in an extreme example of depraved indifference.

In an effort to get Hudak recalled, Colorado activists have experienced extreme harassment, even stalking, with the tacit approval of local law enforcement,

Activist, Mike McAlpine, who headed up the Hudak recall effort, stated that ”We have multiple cars monitoring us at our offices and filming us from the parking lot.” McAlpine went on to say that “This is not a one-off event. We hold sign-and-drive events on the sidewalks near to busy intersections, and we hold signs inviting people to pull over and sign the petition. Our opponents have taken to blocking us: as cars pull in, they run up to the driver’s side door and physically stand next to the door so that the person inside cannot open the door and come outside.”

McAlpine further stated that “… opponents have formed human chains in order to block anyone who wants to sign. “They yell at the person while they’re at the table trying to sign, or blow an airhorn in their ear. There have been a half-dozen examples of that. In addition, when we go out to knock on doors and present the petition, they will follow us down the sidewalk and scream and yell.”

This is where this gets very interesting. The Climate Change Project is involved and they are using their thug contacts, which helped to propel Obama into the White house.

These radical leftist groups have poured a lot of money into the state. “Legal filings reveal that the Democracy Defense Fund, which opposed the recall, received $25,000 from the National Education Association, $10,000 from SEIU, and $5,000 from the Colorado AFL-CIO. Records show that, by yesterday, Democracy Defense Fund had received $120,000.”

Colorado Law Enforcement Runs Interference for the Agenda 21 Forces Invading Colorado

McAlpine states that local law enforcement refuses to respond to the allegations of harassment , intimidation and stalking. He further states that “Our City Hall and the Department of Motor Vehicles, both of which are public institutions. The police have escorted our people off of those locations with the explicit reason that they would arrest us if we came back because we were asking government employees for signatures, and that is illegal.” Yet, other groups are permitted to circulated petitions in the same proximity. What we have here is a case of the police protecting the illegal harassment activities of the anti-gun forces in Colorado. Meanwhile,McAlpine states that “We stay 100 feet from the entrance to be approximately safe, “nonetheless, the city has deployed the police to escort us off the premises with the direct threat that they will arrest us next time.”


The Agenda 21 forces are ruining farm land, lessening crop production, denying lawful access to water and breaking the law in opposing the pro Second Amendment supporters and their legitimate political activities.

Colorado is a beta test for the rest of the nations. If the Koch brothers and their Agenda 21 allies get their way in Colorado, they will undoubtedly unleash this tyranny across the country.

Dave is an award winning psychology, statistics and research professor, a college basketball coach, a mental health counselor, a political activist and writer who has published dozens of editorials and articles in several publications such as Freedoms PhoenixNews With Views and The Arizona Republic.


Thursday, July 18, 2013

Agenda 21 Chapter 8 – The Final Coup

Julie Beal
Activist Post

If you think the economy is simply going to collapse, think again. The bankers, the corporations, and the United Nations have got ecosystem accounting ready to rock and roll, and it’s set to change everything….

… the plan is brilliant. You reduce the number from 7+ billion by at least 33% without firing one shot. You simply privatize all natural resources and then price access so that the bottom third of the globe’s population cannot afford it. And so, they die; it will be the biggest die-off of the Anthropocene epoch. From Papua New Guinea to Croatia, from Bolivia to Ghana, from Canada to Central America, from Scotland to Nigeria, from Australia to America, forests, water rights, mineral rights, arable land, national parks, and much more is being privatized with the usual outcomes: degradation, displacement of indigenous populations, higher costs, lack of access to necessary resources — starvation, death, social unrest and rebellion… (‘Natural Capital and the Real End Game’, Sandy Krolick)

There aren’t enough people talking about this. It casts a whole new light on the TPP, on the reasons for war, possible near-term changes to corporation tax, and economic failure in general, and boggles the mind when it comes to geoengineering. Whilst we can only speculate on these connections, one thing’s for sure – monocultures for biomass-products, GMOs, vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and nuclear energy will play a huge role, as they are now deemed to be renewable and/or socially responsible.

A circular economy which controls production and consumption is the ultimate aim, and this entails deep surveillance and prescriptive living for what will be called a steady-state system. The system is being implemented by measuring the new capital assets, which are created by pricing people, nature. From these new concepts, alternative currencies are forming – we’ve already got carbon credits, and social credits, and the Club of Rome (and CoR member, Bernard Lietaer), for instance, have proposed Wellness Tokens. George Soros is one of the many New Economists who are promoting community currencies.

It’s time to open our eyes to all Agenda 21 entails: there’s a lot more to it than most activists think. The communitarian ideals of smart growth and sustainable development are but one part of a much bigger movement aiming for global ‘sustainability’ by privatizing the commons. This is achieved by measuring and pricing what are called ‘ecosystem services’, or the benefits accrued from the earth, and from people. It involves putting monetary values on aspects of nature, and the ‘services’ it provides (such as pollination), as well as pricing the productivity and overall conformity of human beings (see the U.N. plan to increase Global Happiness).

World Bank and the OECD are just two of the globalists which have perfected the ways of pricing nature, and human well-being. The next step is for corporations and governments to incorporate these prices into their financial accounts, as mandated by chapter 8 of Agenda 21. This goes under various names; the term used for the masses is ‘going beyond GDP’, but more formally, the process is known as ‘integrated reporting’. Rather than just add up the usual profits and losses, they have to factor in new kinds of assets and liabilities, i.e. all the positive and negative effects the companies have, upon the earth, and upon people.

Apart from the usual built capital, i.e. goods and infrastructure, that normally make up the accounts of a company, and which are being restricted due to the fear of scarcity, four new types of self-perpetuating capital are now required to be priced, and accounted for. This new system of accountancy has been advanced for many years, and the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) has devised a framework which is to be implemented globally.

Specifically, there are five alternative forms of capital considered in the framework: manufactured capital accounts for machines the organisation uses to produce its goods or services; natural capital such as air, water and land; human capital covering not only people’s skills and experience, but also motivations or rewards to innovate; intellectual capital taking in the intangibles providing competitive advantage; and social capital – defined as the community stakeholders which “enhance individual and collective wellbeing”, which supports the business model. (Source)

The process of ecosystem accounting is generally made up of well-intentioned environmentalists, but led and paid for by trans-national corporations (TNCs), including Monsanto, Syngenta, Novartis, BP, Shell, Alcoa, General Motors, and Coca-Cola. (Source)

It’s unlikely that these corporations would be considered at all ‘sustainable’ by the environmentalists they are funding. Several corporations, such as Bayer, have also partnered with the U.N. to advance the protocol of Agenda 21.

Since the inception of the protocol, at the Earth Summit in 1992, unsustainable businesses have been busy greening themselves. In the ’90s, corporate governance became the hot topic, leading to the promotion of ‘business ethics’, and seeding the idea that corporations ‘care’ about the consequences of their actions. Small changes were made to how companies were run, so that they could promote themselves as ‘doing the right thing’. All of the top companies now have a team who deal with the image of the firm in terms of its ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR). Although the focus has been on carbon-reduction, the social aspect has become increasingly hyped. Being ‘socially responsible’ is said to mean showing consideration for the well-being of all shareholders (i.e. the people you interact with, or all those affected by the operations of a business) and usually manifests as donating to social causes, or getting company employees to do volunteer work for a charity.

There has been a concurrent rise in social investment, such that philanthro-capitalism is now mainstream. The City of London Corporation promotes itself as conforming to the green and caring new world order in much the same way as the other major players:

The City Corporation has been active in the “Social Action” area for many years. We call this activity “Supporting Society”. We already have a proud record of promoting volunteering, environmental management, philanthropy and other forms of social responsibility such as local recruitment and responsible procurement to City businesses, workers, residents and our own staff.

Commenting on the rise of social investment, Mark Boleat, Policy Chairman at the City of London Corporation, noted there is now a “fast-increasing demand for risk and growth capital”, and recommends applying tax reliefs to social investment. Earlier this year, he said:

A recent report by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) found that demand in the social investment market in England could reach £1bn by 2016, five times what it is today…… the demand for capital in the social sector could grow at a rate of 38% per annum.

Since the Fortune 500 gave birth to, and raised, their corporate images to the new green standard, there have been many changes to company law around the world to enforce corporate ‘commitments’ to being carbon-neutral, and socially responsible. There has also been a huge increase in businesses which help both the public and the private sector to achieve these commitments, such that now the ‘sustainability industry’ is booming. Over the years, then, it has become ‘de rigour’ to try to be green.

The concept of ‘sustainable development’ has taken on many layers of meaning, and has become so normalised, that practitioners who use the term have never even heard of Agenda 21. Town planners laugh in the faces of opponents of the agenda, because they believe strongly in what they do. After all, the science is settled – most of the world has already been ‘delphied’, having been besieged with visioning by the media for many years. Think – ‘icecaps melting’ and ‘cute polar bears’. So most people accept the sustainability agenda without question, and need no further ‘nudging’. They are not conscious of steering the agenda themselves, nor of the consequences.

Take, for instance, Lisa Duncan, who is a “Chevron Environmental Specialist”, and has become a volunteer with United Way’s Earn It! Keep It! Save It! free tax preparation program. Lisa says, “The feeling around Chevron is that we live and work in the area and should be part of improving the community….I wanted to help people, and I wanted it to be interesting.” (Source)

Another major mistake is to presume that anyone who says they care about the environment, and pays them to work to ‘save the world’ must be genuine. However, the sudden growth of ‘social giving’, and claims of ‘carbon-neutrality’, by the corporatocracy are not mirrored at the grassroots level. More to the point, those funding the eco-social technocratic smart world order are some of the most unsustainable/non-ecofriendly industries you could think of. Their keenness is so ripe, you can just smell their expectation of the profits they would reap.

So, if you’re going to say a word to anyone about Agenda 21, you’ve really got to tell them that, first and foremost, it’s about creating assets from nature and people. It is a system that will increasezoning and smart growth. The plan is so huge, so ambitious, and so nearly ready – and it encompasses EVERY vileness of the New World Order we deplore.

Take drones, for instance. They would be used to spy on people to ensure compliance with the new regime, e.g. gathering evidence of anyone damaging an asset, such as marring a pretty view in an eco-tourist hotspot, or walking on soil in a protected area.

Take smart meters – these will be but one mechanism to enforce allocation of individual energy allowances, in the steady-state system.

Take GMOs and vaccines – they are part of the caring façade of the NWO, as they are already being marketed as ‘socially and environmentally responsible’ – the NewSpeak rationale for global law.

Take national sovereignty, political ideology, the ability to choose where and who you want to be – all of these are subsumed by the New Economy, which is a global database of assets and liabilities, comprised of measurements of natural, built and human capital.

The right to give birth, access to water, food, clean air, a home, a gun, and possibly even the right to life – all will come under the laws associated with ownership of resources, and the aim of the communitarian steady-state system: R2P – to avoid running out, to protect what they say we have, and to always leave enough for future generations.

I hope, for all our sakes, that people will wake up to this, and obstruct it. No one can confer the responsibility to do so, but it sure would be good.

Think about the wars being waged – it’s not just central banks and the expansion of development/extraction in the Third World that the elites want. They need EVERY country to abide by the new system, because it can only be said to work if ALL production, and ALL consumption, is tallied and priced, so that quantum computers can claim to run global simulations of the ups and downs of the bio-economy. The idea is that we have to balance consumption with production, on a global scale, to maintain an ecological and psychological equilibrium, using the steady-state economic paradigm. It involves collecting a huge amount of data, on all of us. It is also open to endless abuses from the manipulation of data and statistics, such as by re-defining what constitutes scarcity, abundance, value. For this, the system needs data from all parts of the world. Non-compliance would be deemed akin to eco-terrorism!

The number of power-brokers playing the game of Global Monopoly is being reduced.

The countries which are not yet following the laws of Agenda 21 need to be made to comply. Iran, Iraq, Russia, China, Egypt, Afghanistan, and Israel have already joined the sustainability-club. Now the elites need to convince North Korea and Syria, and more of the African nations, such as Somalia, to conform. Widespread bombing may no longer be the choice method of control, since this damages profitable natural capital assets. Cyber-war and targeted drone strikes are much cleaner, less damaging to the environment – and this is worth much MUCH more to them than the (unproductive) people they kill.

The earth is being sold off: incorporated. And so are we. Because part of the plan involves measuring our happiness, which they call well-being, and so the countries which have the fittest, strongest, well-fed, schooled and happy conformists will be the ones who secure higher measures of GDP. This plan to ‘go beyond GDP’ – measuring the worth of the earth, and the people – will lead to the commodification of these new assets, which will then be tradeable, just like carbon. Over time, they come to function as currencies.

A good starting point to try and wrap your head around some of the basic concepts is a child-friendly guide, published by Peace Child International, the U.N.’s Youth Movement, called ‘Introduction to Sustainable Devleopment’. It describes in simple terms the new economy being shaped by Agenda 21 (including Happiness Economics), and illustrates how lovely it all sounds.

Even the oceans are being sold off – or rather, the services they are deemed to provide, such as the profits gained from fishery, and ecotourism.

Besides the Green Economy, investment in the services provided by the oceans is growing. In February, this Blue Economy was given a boost by a new public-private partnership, launched with an investment of $1.5bn by World Bank’s Global Partnership for Oceans at The Economist’s World Oceans Summit. The system requires a constant stream of data from sensors like bioMEMS, and satellites, such as the Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) technology(Source)

Things are moving fast now. It’s time to spread the word.


Smoking Gun Proof ‘Sustainable Development’ IS U.N. Agenda 21

Truthstream Media.com


Alternative media outlets across the Internet (including ours) have sounded the alarm against the dangers Agenda 21 poses to our national sovereignty and our personal rights.

Still, many people from our politicians on down continue to push the myth that sustainable development is not Agenda 21 and Agenda 21 is not in any way tied to a United Nations takeover and bid for global governance. Agenda 21 began at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and has continued through the formation of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development right on down to ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability and pretty much all other local planning groups seen today (and there are a lot of those groups).

Recently, Missourinet reported that Governor Jay Nixon vetoed two pieces of anti-Agenda 21 legislation passed by the state’s House, claiming the threats posed by Agenda 21 are “imaginary”:

“Nixon states in a press release that he has struck down two pieces of legislation that would have imposed new mandates on local communities in an attempt to solve problems that do not exist, including a decades-old nonbinding United Nations’ resolution known as ‘Agenda 21′ … ‘While the problems these bills ostensibly aim to fight are only imaginary, the headaches they could create for local governments would be very real and costly.’”

Interesting comment considering that the majority (if not all) of these local sustainable development boards are non-elected boards which drive policy anyway and serve to ‘pick winners and losers’ when it comes to who can build what and where to ensure a town is planned and continues to grow along Agenda 21 guidelines.

The phrase “sustainable development” has always been a code word for the United Nation’s Agenda 21. While most local sustainable development planning groups will attempt to deny their allegiance to the UN’s Agenda 21 plan all day long, Tom DeWeese at NewswithViews.com found anAmerican Planning Association (APA) newsletter dating back to 1994 which openly admits all ties and spells out exactly how these sustainable development initiatives are really just implementing Agenda 21:

“The document was an APA newsletter to its members in the Northern California (San Francisco Area). The article was a commentary entitled ‘How Sustainable is Out Planning’, by Robert Odland. It was written just two years after the UN Earth Summit at which Agenda 21 was first introduced to the world.

The fifth paragraph of the article says, ‘Vice President Gore’s book, Earth in the Balance addressed many of the general issues of sustainability. Within the past year, the President’s Council on Sustainable Development has been organized to develop recommendations for incorporating sustainability into the federal government. Also, various groups have been formed to implement Agenda 21, a comprehensive blueprint for sustainable development that was adopted at the recent UNCED conference in Rio de Janeiro(the ‘Earth Summit.’)’.” [emphasis added]

Incorporating sustainability into the federal government, huh? Wait, isn’t Agenda 21 supposed to be “non-binding”? This APA newsletter even managed to refer to it as a “comprehensive blueprint”.

DeWeese notes two important factors to be considered when reading this document:

A) The APA (like many of the local planning initiatives you will find in your area) vehemently denies it has any ties to Agenda 21:

“Continuously we hear that local planning programs, especially from such groups like the American Planning Association (APA) have no connection to Agenda 21 or the UN. It’s all local – or as the APA says in its document, Glossary for the Public, ‘There is no hidden agenda.’ In its ‘Agenda 21: Myths and Facts’ document found on the APA website, the group goes to extreme measures to distance itself and its policies from Agenda 21, specifically saying ‘The American Planning Association has no affiliation regarding any policy goals and recommendations of the UN.’”

No affiliation except literal admission in its own newsletter!

B) This APA newsletter does a fabulous job of connecting all the dots between local sustainable development groups and a UN Agenda 21 takeover from the ground up:

“In one paragraph, this document brings together the APA, Agenda 21, the UN’s Earth Summit, Al Gore, Sustainable Development, the President’s Council on Sustainable Development, NGO groups with the mission of implementing Agenda 21 and the description of Agenda 21 as a ‘comprehensive Blueprint’ for Sustainable planning.”

Agenda 21 is about total control of our personal property, our ability to travel, our energy consumption…the list literally goes on and on. As Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21 states, under an Agenda 21 future, “Your energy consumption will be controlled until you can’t farm, can’t manufacture, can’t travel, can’t fish, can’t use your land. Productivity and businesses are limited now.”

Through pushing everyone into smart cities and onto smart grids, the Obama EPA’s clampdown on coal, and the steering of all manner of public policy from land-use and land ownership restrictions to seemingly small traffic initiatives that ultimately restrict personal travel, evidence of Agenda 21 can be found everywhere we look these days.

It’s just as former Rockefeller Board of Trustees member (the Rockefeller Foundation is behind Agenda 21 imitative “America 2050″ among others) and Earth Council Chairman Maurice Strongenvisioned when he wrote the forward to ICLEI’s “The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide”sustainable development implementation document:

“In my parting words at the conclusion of the Earth Summit, I said that we all ‘must move down from the Summit and into the trenches where the real world actions and decisions are taken that will, in the final analysis, determine whether the vision of Rio will be fulfilled and the agreements reached there implemented.’ Of the many programs that have resulted from the Earth Summit, none is more promising or important than this one, which has hundreds of local authorities around the world now setting out and implementing their Local Agenda 21s.”



Thursday, June 27, 2013

What Does Agenda 21 Have To Do With GMO’s And Poisoned Food?

Sam ‘I Be’ Di Gangi
Activist Post

Many people are starting to read the grim writing upon the wall in terms of Agenda 21, what it has done and HAS been doing to any functional progress. There is a reason that America grew in ways that the world had hardly seen prior and in turn why it is NOT growing in such a way now. There is a reason why “the gilded age” saw riches pouring into the nation as industry boomed and a reason why today the third world has all of that industry as their citizens toil for slave wages.

That reason, in large part, is called Agenda 21, the dreadful path chosen for us by the United Nations, CFR, and ultimately our own leaders. Under Agenda 21, America has lost industry, progress, and employment in numbers never envisioned in our grandparents worst nightmares of losing even WW2! All of this is thankfully becoming more and more understood by more and more people.

So, what does all of this Agenda 21 evil have to do with GMOs and our growing poisoned food supply?

Well as it stands, Agenda 21 espouses the total nonsense that there are too many people on the Earth today, and while we do our best to cull the numbers, the only way to feed everyone in the meantime is to genetically modify our food supply with toxins. (This is seen by many to ALSO be a culling method) Never mind that science has proven that man is not warming the planet or that if every man/woman/child alive today all had the living space of the average New Yorker they could all fit easily into the state of Texas, for these facts simply can be ignored by a population that is as dumbed down as they currently are.

So as we toxify our food sources to feed the masses, what exactly is it that we are ingesting? While the whole globe suffers from the ill effects of Agenda 21 to some degree or another, the United States of America seems to have it the worst in this regard. According to Babble.com, 80% of prepackaged food that is sold in America is actually banned in other nations. [1]

In that article, you will discover terrible facts regarding things like Olestra that is often put into low fat or fat free foods. Olestra has been linked to MANY gastrointestinal dilemmas and that is why it is banned in both the United Kingdom and Canada. Many popular colas contain brominated vegetable oil that has been made illegal to use in over 100 nations (!) because it has been tied to cancer, autoimmune issues, and just about every other unwanted health scenario that one can think of. However, in America, it is in use, marketed and fed to children and sports fans.

Yellow #5 and #6 that is found in many Kraft products such as Mac and Cheese and is known to lead to cancer, has been linked to a slew of allergies, and is one of the many toxins that we have all been warned about that lurk in our shampoos. Yes, both yellow poisons are used in shampoos and cereal on a regular basis.

Singapore has a 15-year prison sentence and a $500,000 fine awaiting those that use azodicarbonamide in food products, while in America these toxins are used to make yoga mats, is present in our bread products and in our frozen foods. Sure, most of Europe has wisely banned it, but that should not affect anything at all, should it?

Look up how BHA causes awful cancers as Kellogg’s, Post, and Quaker serve it up in each serving of cereal. Look it up, and you may begin to wonder why companies are even using it. There are many other things that also can be used. We know this because these vile companies have managed to find substitutes in other nations where they also do business, so why is the United States different? Many argue that Agenda 21 is set on destroying America’s sovereignty and also set on seeing the population begin the aforementioned culling in numbers by killing off Americans in this way. To what degree that this is true can be debated, but the use of things like BHA in the American food supply does certainly lend credence to such views.

In closing, let’s take a closer look at pop. After all, most Americans love their pop, so what is it that we are drinking? Again, GMO’s are the biggest part of the problem and this is proven in two ways; 1) most organic stores have sodas of many kinds that are much less problematic than their big name regulars and 2) we did not see these kinds of health issues like diabetes and cancers when sugar was used in place of high fructose corn syrup, which is of course made with corn that often times Monsanto has injected bug sprays into. Today, “mainstream” pop is best avoided or at least relegated to a rare treat.

A recent US Heath article indicates clearly just how bad drinking soda can be for someone when they reported on how a 31-year-young woman had her heartbeat irregular after spending 15 years drinking a couple of two liters a day.[2] Her potassium levels were dangerously low and she almost died like others mentioned in the piece had prior to that. Now some will argue that they do not drink 2 two liters of pop a day to which it can be said, ‘Okay, but this lady was only 31 and if one drinks even one two liter every couple of days and live to see 60 or 65, might the damage not be close to equal at some point’?

It is a sad reality that Agenda 21 is not about a warming planet, a large population, or progress but is rather about taking the power from the people and killing off those who are seen as expendable. Our leaders will use lies, false data, and outright tyranny to meet the evil demands of Agenda 21. To defeat it we must learn what the lies are and we must inform all of those who will listen. To do otherwise is to drink the Kool-Aid….or soda.


[1] http://www.babble.com/babble-voices/mamapop-all-access/80-of-pre-packaged-foods-in-american-grocery-stores-banned-in-other-countries/

[2] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348631/Woman-Monaco-31-suffers-heart-problems-drinking-soda-16-years.html

Sam is  a member of The Media Speaks (www.themediaspeaks.com). You can find his work here.


Thursday, June 27, 2013

Agenda 21 and the Rise of Enviro-fascism: Unpacking Ideology

Dees Ilustration

Brad Murphy
Activist Post

There are many individuals that recognize the benefit of preserving certain aspects of the environment based on their own set of values and what they perceive as beneficial. Globalizing market structures have changed the way many view the relationship between individuals and the environment. The program that is commonly referred to as Agenda 21 takes the idea of preserving the environment and wraps it within a political framework of one of the most insidious ideologies of the modern era: Fascism.

Agenda 21 has six primary themes: The quality of life on Earth, the efficient use of the Earth’s natural resources, the management of human settlements, chemicals/management of waste, and facilitating sustainable economic growth.(Sitarz)

When presented in this manner, it would appear that any individual who opposes Agenda 21 and its proposals is someone who completely despises the environment; for who in their right mind could find fault with any of these goals?

The first alarm bell that should sound off when examining the writings of those that advocate Agenda 21 is their dogmatic emphasis on the unanimous passage of the agreement. This emphasis illuminates the mindset of those that would push Agenda 21 on the global community; using catchy slogans like “we have reached a global consensus” and “the science is settled, the debate is over.” Agenda 21 and its policies have been wrapped in a blanket of absolutes, dictating to you, the individual, that the powers-that-be have conducted all the necessary tests, and the final conclusion can only be the rapid and complete adoption of this overarching and globally mandated plan.

But if Agenda 21 is supposedly a plan that halts the degradation of the environment, it would make logical sense that the logistics of said plan would need to be quite specific. However, the language within Agenda 21 is incredibly vague, leaving questions on how exactly these goals will be achieved. For how does one accomplish all the proposed goals of Agenda 21? The entire document is comprised of absolutes; they resemble edicts more than proposals.

All phases of industrialization must be examined and reoriented to emphasize optimal resource use….More accurate assessments and accounting of values, costs, benefits, risks and impacts of land use must be made…As the world population increases and demand for food rises, special efforts must be taken to ensure that the production of food does not harm the fresh water resources of the Earth… (Sitarz)

So if there is no codified implementation of Agenda 21, whose job is it to advance these goals? Point 1.3 of Agenda 21’s preamble states quite clearly who is to assume authority for this paradigm shift:

Agenda 21 addresses the pressing problems of today and also aims at preparing the world for the challenges of the next century. It reflects a global consensus and political commitment at the highest level on development and environment cooperation. Its successful implementation is first and foremost the responsibility of Governments. National strategies, plans, policies and processes are crucial in achieving this… (Sitarz)

Within the text of Agenda 21 itself, Governments have been assigned the premier duty for implementing all subsequent proposals, leaving the actual individuals that comprise the populations of Governmentally ruled nations with the mere role of accepting what has already been deemed as the global consensus.

This type of broadly based, top-down model has been used in the past and falls within a particular ideology. The beginning of this essay identified the undertones of this ideology as fascism. Since the advent of Italian fascism during the early part of the 20th century, fascism as an ideology has evolved to the changing times and accelerating world events: Agenda 21 can effectively be characterized as environmental fascism, or simply, enviro-fascism. Enviro-fascism is a relatively new brand of totalitarianism and Agenda 21 is rife with its adoption of compartmentalized central planning. However, enviro-fascism should not be confused with eco-fascism, albeit the two seem identical at face value: Key differences separate the two.

There were several prominent and vocal eco-fascists within the Nazi and Italian regimes, but these fascistic tendencies revolved around nationalism and trade protectionism. Eco-fascism is generally smaller in scope and focuses on a return to, or exultation of, primitivism with an emphasis on people’s symbiotic relationship with the environment. Enviro-fascism is designed to be a global ideology that conducts sweeping changes on the entire global mindset. The idea of improving sustainable economic growth and human development does not work well with an autonomous nation-state system, each with its own brand of self-interested protectionism. Enviro-fascism advocates for traditional Liberal values such as free trade and is more positive in nature as compared to the cynical proponents of eco-fascism.

Enviro-fascism disguises its authoritarianism with a smiley face because this brand of fascism is here to accomplish what is best for everyone, for humanity in its entirety. Environmentalist David Orton explains that in order to legitimately label somebody an eco-fascist, it is an attempt “…to describe ‘Wise Use’ type activities, that is, against those who want to exploit Nature until the end, solely for human/corporate purposes, and who will do whatever is seen as necessary, including using violence and intimidation against environmentalists and their supporters, to carry on.” (Orton). Enviro-fascism is not as overtly violent or domineering as its eco-fascist ancestors, which, through its deceptive and convoluted language, allows the former to garner a wide-breadth of international support.

But is Agenda 21 really a brand of fascism? To understand what fascism advocates, one only needs to read the writings of Mussolini and other intellectuals of the time. Traditional fascism was the process of turning the State into a religion; it represented the deification State authority upon society and heralded a new moral value system.

Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his immanent relationship with a superior law and with an objective Will that transcends the particular individual and raises him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. Whoever has seen in the religious politics of the Fascist regime nothing but mere opportunism has not understood that Fascism besides being a system of government is also, and above all, a system of thought – Mussolini. (Ball and Dagger)

For Agenda 21, the State is not what is being deified but rather the Earth itself. The environment is the new symbol of authority that humanity must serve: Peter Adriance, former Secretary of the Executive Committee of the U.S. Citizens Network on the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, elaborates…

Primary among the spiritual principles which must guide the systematic implementation of Agenda 21 is the oneness of humanity. It is this cardinal principle that will provide the spiritual, moral, and ethical underpinnings for the successful translation of Agenda 21 into practical action in all parts of the world and at all levels of human society. (Noel and Quiblier)

A spiritualized global system requires a radical value shift because fascist ideology compels its citizens to view their own existence in a very different way. There is no longer individualism, but rather a homogenous view of ‘humanity’:

Agenda 21 is not a static document. It is a plan of action. It is meant to be a hands-on instrument to guide the development of the Earth in a sustainable manner. Recognizing the global nature of the environmental problems that face humanity, it is based on the premise that sustainable development of the Earth is not simply an option: it is a requirement – a requirement increasingly imposed by the limits of nature to absorb the punishment which humanity has inflicted upon it. (Sitarz)

Agenda 21 is in fact a plan of action. It is a plan of action so vague and malleable that it can be adopted and enforced by any means necessary. The absolute language of its proposals reinforces the “ends justify the means” mentality; for when the ends are to benefit the future of humanity, who is any single individual to stand against it? This mentality is rooted in ideological fascism and was advanced by Alfredo Rocco, an Italian law professor and political theorist, who explained:

As a matter of fact, Fascism never raises the question of methods, using in its political praxis now liberal ways, now democratic means, and at times even socialistic devices. This indifference to method often exposes Fascism to the charge of incoherence on the part of superficial observers, who do not see that what counts with us is the end and that therefore even when we employ the same means we act with a radically different spiritual attitude and strive for entirely different results. (Ball and Dagger)

Agenda 21 is designed to be a plan of action. It does not matter how the goals are achieved, because these goals have been assigned a higher moral and ethical value. Agenda 21 marks the arrival of enviro-fascism as a system of authoritarian humanitarianism. This is an attempt at a global paradigm shift: This is a new world order.

Works Cited:

Ball, Terence, and Richard Dagger. Ideals and ideologies: a reader. 7th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2009. Print.

Brown, Noel J., and Pierre Quiblier. Ethics & Agenda 21: moral implications of a global consensus. New York: United Nations Environment Programme, 1994. Print.

Orton, David. “Ecofascism: What is It? A Left Biocentric Analysis.” Home | Inter.net. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 June 2013. .

Sitarz, Dan. AGENDA 21: the Earth Summit strategy to save our planet. Boulder, Colo.: EarthPress, 1993. Print.


Monday, June 24, 2013

The Multiple Prongs of Agenda 21

Dees Illustration

Activist Post

Agenda 21 is an action plan or blueprint of a desired future. This desired future is shrouded in feel good environmental protective development and innovation or otherwise referred to as green, green movement, and/or environmentalism. Sadly, Agenda 21 is an utter ruse for painting a largely Dystopian future as Utopian to many activists and activist groups. There is a larger picture to Agenda 21 that many people either refuse to acknowledge or determined to dismiss the doubt requiring re-evaluation.

Agenda 21 is one pincer of several. Most people don’t realize precisely what Agenda 21 incurs, and many don’t acknowledge that it is a Dystopian nightmare for the vast majority of people. Unless one is a Bureaucrat, Technocrat, Bismarkianist or broadly elitist/statist, and a psychopath-sociopath, Agenda 21 is nowhere near Utopia, its principle underlining tenet is close control and the evaporation or transition of rights, liberties, and freedoms into simply privileges at the discretion of those in control.

Unfortunately, Agenda 21 is much more sophisticated as it is coupled with multiple prongs that encourages its active development and implementation. The first is Bismarkianism; this is a three-stage process using a bait and switch to encourage people of a given populace to tolerate and accept centralized control and expansion of control through central government and governance.

The first stage is socialism as this creates incentives for the populace to support the creation of public-private partnerships, rewarding fiefdoms, and grant the return that pacifies or contents the populace. Once this stage is entrenched, it is used in public relations or otherwise propaganda to progress into national socialism that entails transitioning many of those public-private partnerships into full mergers.

It isn’t much of a stretch that after the next economic crisis strikes that the United States public-private partnerships start finalizing full mergers; and it’s a rather safe bet that the first solid official merger is government-banking, particularly through the Federal Reserve, since with centralized control and advocated public-private government-banking partnership established in 1913 along with the corrupt and unprosecuted fraud of the designated Too Big To Fail Banks ends with a full public-private merger. Public-Private mergers then repeat the Progressive meme to enable the allowance of the official establishment of authoritarianism/totalitarianism, or effectively the creation of an absent Monarch with Absolute Authority/Despotism.

It is rather evident that some readers will be skeptical to this; however, this is intertwined to the approaching democracy or democracy movement. This means that the minority voices, ideas, etc. to be effectively removed from consideration or even value. It also largely transitions Congress into more of a Parliamentary body under the President’s authority than any two bodies with checks and balances separating them. In effect, centralization is able to further entrench itself through welfare and warfare aka security, protection, etc. Of the prongs, this is perhaps the main mechanism driving Agenda 21, as it crosses welfare, interstate commerce, remolded interpretation of the supremacy clause, and national security.

The next prong is the Malthusian and Eugenicist merger and re-imaging of Eugenics through Neo-Malthusianism and women’s health/reproductive health; the Neo-Malthusianism prong is perhaps the most hidden of the prongs beyond its more visible components such as women’s health/reproductive rights and transhumanism. These prongs would not be complete without the supranational/universal movements; this is the principle prong in which Agenda 21 operates as a supranational action plan to be taken locally, largely altering the relationship of local-state-national governments to in effect largely become stewards, regents, or clerks of the supranational body. In this particular case, the supranational body and its subsidiaries are derived by the United Nations.

These make up an non-exhaustive list of the prongs to Agenda 21 and what they effectively are designed to do, which is largely consolidate and expand power behind a centralized authority.

Agenda 21 is not compatible with individual rights, liberties, and freedoms; it is a Collectivist movement. One of the oldest battles are individuals versus the Collective; the differences between a collective and a community is, in short, under the basis of a community is a group of individuals who live or reside in proximity to other individuals who work together through cooperation for mutual benefit, protection, and livelihood. Collectives operate under mandates of each individual to partake or otherwise participate in demands of the governing body who categorizes groups of individuals as groups of people for mainly its benefit. This is more like a hive or ant colony than a community, as each and every individual’s benefit to the Collective is determined by its benefit to the governing regime; the individual is of little to no value in such systems.

Quoting a question from the movie Swordfish, John Travolta’s character asked “If you could cure cancer but had to kill one child, could you kill that child?” The Collectivist answer is not only a resounding ‘YES!’ it also dictates that the child would be willing to die even painfully to cure cancer. Why is this relevant? Agenda 21 strips individuals of their rights, liberties, and freedoms and transitions them to privileges at the governing regime’s discretion. The whole march that the United States is conducting towards despotism, authoritarianism, and totalitarianism such as the Police State, erosion of the Constitution codifying natural rights limits on government for each individual, and the implementation of privileges rather than rights, liberties, and freedoms are within Agenda 21, Neo-Malthusianism, and the desires of the likely soon to be fully merged public-private partnerships on a local and global scale. In fact, Agenda 21 names every person of the entire populace a piece of capital and resource to be allocated. This is in effect enslavement, and it’s designed to encourage people to love, yearn for, and even advocate for the servitude of all, which is simply a variation of Bismarkianism.

Agenda 21 is an action plan that is being implemented at the local level but derived from the supranational institution of the United Nations; it is a plan or blueprint designed to transition each individual into collective capital and resources or otherwise enslaved with privileges it can revoke at any given time largely for any reason it determines. Agenda 21 is shrouded in feel good activism from the environmental/green movement; it’s implementation can mainly be halted through informing other people what Agenda 21 is and what it does.

Agenda 21 is derived by its mechanism sustainable development that centers on environmental accounting and land-use by the environmental accounting measurement of a given development/project, and it names every man, woman, and child as capital and resources to be determined and allocated through and by sustainable development. Bill Gates once announced the only way to bring down CO2 emissions is by bringing down population, consumption, and/or production to near zero. Sustainable Development effectively means stifling class mobility, consumption, and in effect population as these policies will result in widespread starvation, famine, and etc. This makes Agenda 21 an action plan using a mask of its true intentions behind feel good activism to encourage its full implementation largely in the name of environmental welfare.

About this entry