Why Are There No Real Photos of The Complete Earth? = NASA has never been into space far enough from the Earth to get the whole planet in the frame

Exohuman.com

IN NEARLY 60 YEARS of alleged space exploration NASA has never been able to offer us a single genuine photograph of the Earth from space—NOT ONE! Even though we’ve had good, high-resolution cameras for nearly 100 years, NASA has never taken a true photograph of the Earth.

By their own admission, all of the pictures we see are composites, paintings or computer-generated images. Why is this? Could the answer be, horror of horrors, that NASA has never been into space—or at least, not far enough from the Earth to get the whole planet in the frame?

shuttle-launches

Houston, We Have a Problem…

ABOVE are some photos of NASA rocket and space shuttle launches, using long exposures to allow us to follow the craft for much longer that we get to see during typical TV coverage. Notice anything strange about the trajectories? Well, I’m no rocket scientist, but according to my Flash Gordon comics rockets are supposed to go straight up—not up and then immediately back down again… or somewhere out to sea!

Oh dear. | More: Rockets Go No Higher Than 100,000 Feet | Rockets Don’t Work in Space

Houston, We Have Another Problem…

SURROUNDING THE EARTH, beginning at an altitude of 1,000 miles and extending an additional 25,000 miles, lie lethal bands of radiation called the Van Allen Radiation Belts, that would fry on-board instrumentation and sicken any astronauts foolhardy enough to pass throught them.

So how did the Apollo missions get through the Van Allen Belts back in the 1960s, when NASA is currently struggling with ways to protect its astronauts on their (alleged) upcoming trip to Mars? In this video, NASA engineer, Kelly Smith, tries to explain. | More: Astronaut says: “We can only fly in Earth orbit.”

Three Naughty Schoolboys

HERE’S SOMETHING for anyone who still believes we went to the Moon. It’s the toe-curling Apollo 11 Press Conference immediately after the astronauts’ return to Earth. Bear in mind that these three Freemasons, sorry—astronauts, sorry—men have supposedly just returned from the greatest adventure in the history of mankind.

These guys are national heroes. They have fulfilled every young boy’s dream. We would expect them to be exhilarated, animated—thrilled to have survived the journey, let alone walked on the Moon! And yet they are curiously subdued, nervously checking their teleprompters, and each other, when answering reporters’ questions. “Stars? What stars..?”

Poor Buzz Lightyear…

No one went to the Moon. Worse still, it’s likely that no one has ever left the planet…

NASA HASN’T BEEN ANYWHERE!

WHAT IF it’s not possible to send things into space, to even put things in Earth orbit? There are THREE serious obstacles to getting things into space and getting them to stay there, and these need to be accomodated within our “reality framework” so we can determine what is real and what is NASA moonshine (yes, the Moon does shine).

exploding-spaceship

1. The Thermosphere

FORGET about the lethal Van Allen radiation belts, that stretch for thousands of miles around the Earth, the number one reason why nothing has ever gone into space is THE THERMOSPHERE:

This atmospheric layer starts at about 50 miles high, where temperatures start to rise until the Kármán line is reached at 62 miles. Beyond this point, the heat increases dramatically, rising rapidly up to 125 miles, where temperatures can reach 2500°C!

in-orbit

FOR REFERENCE: the oven in your kitchen can hit 240°C max. A crematorium reaches 1000°C, and a blast furnace for melting iron can go as high as 2300°C. NASA uses aluminum, magnesium, titanium, and epoxy-graphite composites to build its spacecraft—all of which would melt in these high temperatures of the thermosphere.

Aluminum and magnesium both melt at 660°C, titanium at 1668°C. While graphite has a high melting point (5500°C), it is also an excellent conductor of heat—although their spacecraft would most likely fall apart long before it cooked the astronauts to a crisp! Humans cannot survive exposures above 70°C.

2. The Orbiting Mechanism

newtonWHY DO THINGS FLOAT in space when they’re beyond 100km from the Earth? Does gravity magically stop affecting objects at this distance? The official answer is that above 100km objects are essentially free-falling, but if something is traveling fast enough laterally, like the space shuttle at 28,000 km/h, then this speed will cause the object to perpetually fall along the convex curve of the Earth, thereby never actually reaching the ground—hence maintaining itself “in orbit.” 

This is known as gravitational theory, the extrapolation of an idea originally conceived by Isaac Newton in the 17th century, and today increasingly dismissed by most clear-thinking people who have their feet firmly on the ground. In fact Newton himself, after some contemplation, thought the practical application of his theory ridiculous, as he laid out in a letter to a friend, Richard Bentley in 1692:

“That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that
one body can act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without
the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force
may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that
I believe no man, who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty
of thinking, can ever fall into it.”
—Isaac Newton

THE IDEA that a body with sufficient mass can exert an attractive force upon another, such as a planet is assumed to have over its moon (astronauts and spacecraft), has never been demonstrated or proved. A growing number of physicists are questioning whether gravity exists at all. | See: Gravity Does Not Exist!

3. The Abundance of Fakery

If NASA really has put things into orbit, sent men to the Moon and launched probes into outer space, then why is there so much secrecy, subterfuge and fakery about it? And most condemning of all—why can’t NASA produce a SINGLE genuine photograph of the Earth from space?

MUCH more: wildheretic.com | What, no Space Station? | The Gravity Hoax

The Famous “Blue Marble”

LOVELY ISN’T IT? It’s FAKE! This iconic image (below) was cobbled together from alleged ‘satellite’ data and then crudely photoshopped—as you will see if you click on the image.

The discovery of duplicate clouds has led to accusations that not only is the 2002 image (Blue Marble II) a fake, but the original Apollo 17 image (Blue Marble I) was likely a fake as well. That, in turn, has led some to question whether everything NASA did and said was fake. | More

blue-marble

NASA SAYS: This spectacular “blue marble” image is the most detailed true-color image of the entire Earth to date. Using a collection of satellite-based observations, scientists and visualizers stitched together months of observations of the land surface, oceans, sea ice, and clouds into a seamless, true-color mosaic of every square kilometre of our planet. | More: Here

It’s All About Expectations, Says NASA Artist:

simmon-nasa-artist“The last time anyone took a photograph from above low Earth orbit that showed an entire hemisphere (one side of a globe) was in 1972 during Apollo 17. NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS) satellites were designed to give a check-up of Earth’s health. By 2002, we finally had enough data to make a snap shot of the entire Earth. So we did.

“The hard part was creating a flat map of the Earth’s surface with four months’ of satellite data. Reto Stockli, now at the Swiss Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, did much of this work. Then we wrapped the flat map around a ball.

“My part was integrating the surface, clouds, and oceans to match people’s expectations of how Earth looks from space. That ball became the famous Blue Marble.”Robert Simmon, NASA artist

ALL JOLLY FASCINATING, but wouldn’t it be easier to simply take a photograph—just onephotograph—from one of your oh-so-many ‘satellites’? Apparently not. The good folks at NASA tell us the only whole Earth ‘photos’ they have were taken during the Apollo 17 mission. The fact that this mission, along with all the other Apollo missions, never actually left the Earth, is going to make finding these shots problematic. | More: Stanley Kubrick’s Faked Moon Landings | Create Your Own Fake Earth

More NASA Fakery Here…

YES BUT NASA does have satellites. Don’t they? I mean, NASA has been sending things into space for years, haven’t they? Have they? How would we know? The trouble is that this U.S. government agency, with its multi-billion dollar budget, has a monopoly on all things spatial.

The only way to know for sure would be to go up there ourselves, independently from NASA, and take a look around. This is exactly what Sir Richard Branson tried in 2014…

Virgin-Galactic-crash

The Sky’s the Limit

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED to Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic hopes? His dream was to “take tourists to the edge of space,” at a starting price of around $200,000, with around 800 people, including many celebrities and stars already signed up.

Then, during a test flight in October, 2014, Virgin’s Spaceship Two exploded at an altitude of 45,000ft and crashed, killing one of the two pilots and injuring the other—and starting countless “sabotage” and “shootdown” conspiracy theories. While the official reason for the explosion was an in-flight “anomaly,” a more sinister explanation might be that someone didn’t want Branson poking around up there.

(If the latter is true, Branson hasn’t taken the hint, because he’s just rolled out his second spaceship.)

CURIOUSLY, just a few days before the Virgin Galactic crash, Orbital ATK’s Antares rocket explodedjust after lift-off in Virginia. Spookily, this explosion was also described by a NASA spokesman as a catastrophic “anomaly.” The rocket was allegedly on its way to the International Space Station.

What’s interesting is that this wasn’t a NASA rocket, it was built by Orbital ATK, an independent aerospace company specializing in space, defense and aviation-related systems—including tactical missiles, defense electronics, precision weapons and armament systems. So exactly what it was planning to take into space is open to conjecture, although NASA warned people to keep away from the debris

Conclusion

IS THERE a conclusion to be made? By conclusion do we mean a judgment or determination about the reality of NASA’s so-called “Space Program”? Is that what we want, even if it risks being presented with a worse case scenario where it’s all been a big fat lie?

Because if, as the facts seem to indicate, NASA hasn’t even made it into orbit (whatever that is), then we need to get used to a completely new reality—without Moon landingssatellitesHubble telescopeInternational Space Station, or Mars Missions. If, worse still, one of the reasons there’s nothing in orbit is because gravity doesn’t exist, then what is preventing us from falling off NASA’s ball-Earth?

panorama

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon | newly discovered behind-the-scenes out-takes from the first mission to the moon, proving that the crew never left earth orbit

Published on Apr 14, 2013

Award winning filmmaker Bart Sibrel (Sibrel.com) presents his highly acclaimed (and much hated) controversial documentary showcasing newly discovered behind-the-scenes out-takes from the first mission to the moon, proving that the crew never left earth orbit.

More: Human Space Travel Hoaxes | Who Made the Moon–and Why? | What’s Real?

Advertisements

About this entry