Most Censored Paper On Earth
Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published
Are the official medical / scientific editorial boards who censored this important and, frankly, rather obvious research guilty under Executive Order 13818, against global corruption and crimes against humanity? -
After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH | Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law:
Editorial Staff
This comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancet and later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International.
Here’s what we found:
Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.
Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included. Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.
Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).
Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.
Our study indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a Class I recall as: “A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.”
The censorship and retraction of studies that show COVID-19 mRNA injection harms is deeply concerning.
First, this study was inappropriately removed from Preprints with the Lancet (SSRN). The paper was posted on the server on July 5th, 2023 and censored in less than 24 hours after receiving massive numbers of downloads and reads, “because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” However, the study initially satisfied SSRN screening criteria, which raises grave suspicions of censorship.
Then began the long process of submitting critical COVID-19 vaccine autopsy data to nearly 20 publications, facing repeated rejections without peer-review:
Approximately a year after our study was wiped from Preprints with the Lancet, on June 21st, 2024, the paper was published after successful peer-review in Forensic Science International:
On July 3rd, 2024, our study was the #1 trending research paper worldwide across all subject areas within the last 2 weeks according to the Observatory of International Research:
Thus, we can assume that scientists, physicians, and the public were eager to learn about critical post-mortem safety data regarding COVID-19 injections. Unfortunately, in a striking act of censorship, Elsevier and Forensic Science International withdrew the article on August 2nd, 2024 in flagrant violation of their own withdrawal policy and COPE guidelines. They left no traces behind, completely wiping our paper from the webpage.
Anonymous ‘members of the scientific community’ declared that our study should not be published. A comprehensive rebuttal against the unfounded concerns was provided to the journal, which was concerningly rejected in accordance with two anonymous post-publication reviewers.
Elsevier and Forensic Science International failed to follow the proper scientific discourse method of allowing debate in Letters to the Editor. This type of academic censorship poses a serious threat to the progress of scientific discovery.
The republication of our autopsy study marks a significant setback for the Biopharmaceutical Complex and their Academic Publishing Cartel, signaling a pivotal victory for transparency and accountability in science.
Source: www.mcculloughfnd.org
Original Article: https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/breaking-news-twice-censored-landmark-covid-19-vaccine-autopsy-study-fully-peer-reviewed-and-published/
Related:
Dr. William Makis MD
Truthful comments that add value to our readers, such as additional information, clarification, validation or worthy rebuttal will be posted. The goal of comments on articles is to gain additional truth.