A New Study Demands an Immediate HALT to the COVID-19 mRNA Injections
Lioness of Judah Ministry | substack.com/@lionessofjudah
“A moratorium on the use of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines and boosters should be enacted at minimum, but ideally, they should be REMOVED from the market, and their use in humans should be STOPPED.”
That’s the conclusion of a study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. The report reveals glaring flaws and alarming safety concerns surrounding Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 injections.
Here’s a breakdown of the study’s key points, as shared by epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH:
1.) COVID-19 modRNA vaccines were labeled as traditional vaccines instead of gene therapy products, allowing them to skip stricter regulatory oversight.
2.) The spike protein produced by these vaccines is toxic and linked to immune-related complications.
3.) Pfizer’s own data shows lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and modRNA spreading throughout the body—including the liver, spleen, ovaries, and adrenal glands.
4.) Spike protein production wasn’t limited to the injection site, contradicting early claims.
5.) Within just three months of rollout, Pfizer’s post-authorization data revealed 1,223 deaths and a flood of serious adverse events.
6.) Reports of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccines skyrocketed, far surpassing those for any prior vaccine, yet no significant action was taken.
As such, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, says:
“Using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic [spike] protein that persists in the body for months to years was one of the worst ideas in human history.”
Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 modRNA Vaccines: Dangerous Genetic Mechanism of Action Released before Sufficient Preclinical Testing
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH | substack.com/@nichulscher
As calls for an immediate moratorium on COVID-19 mRNA injections intensify, Oldfield et al just published a new study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons titled, Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 modRNA Vaccines: Dangerous Genetic Mechanism of Action Released before Sufficient Preclinical Testing:
Here’s a concise summary of the study’s main points:
- Regulatory Classification and Guidelines:
- COVID-19 modRNA vaccines were misclassified as traditional vaccines rather than gene therapy products, bypassing stricter regulatory requirements.
- WHO guidelines from 2005 were used for nonclinical assessments, despite being outdated and inapplicable to modRNA vaccines.
- Spike Protein and Safety Concerns:
- The spike protein produced by modRNA vaccines is toxic and can cause immune-related complications.
- Studies on pharmacokinetics (how much spike protein is produced, where it distributes, and how long it persists) were not conducted as part of Pfizer’s submission.
- Spike protein production varies among individuals based on genetics, health status, and other factors, but this variability was never studied.
- Biodistribution and LNP Behavior:
- Pfizer’s own biodistribution data showed lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and modRNA were widely distributed throughout the body, including the liver, spleen, ovaries, and adrenal glands.
- Contrary to claims, spike protein production was not limited to the injection site, raising concerns about off-target effects and toxicity.
- Toxicology and Carcinogenicity Testing:
- Pfizer did not conduct genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies, despite the potential for the spike protein and LNPs to cause harm.
- Wistar Han™ rats, which are not a relevant species for SARS-CoV-2 toxicity studies, were used inappropriately in preclinical testing.
- Deficient Clinical Trials:
- Phase I clinical trials failed to measure critical factors like the amount and variability of spike protein produced in individuals.
- Placebo groups in initial trials were unblinded early, undermining the integrity of long-term safety and efficacy data.
- Post-authorization data from Pfizer showed 1,223 deaths and numerous serious adverse events within the first three months of vaccine rollout.
- The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) documented a huge spike in reported adverse events following the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, far exceeding reports for previous vaccines.
- Despite the massive increase in reported deaths and injuries, no corrective actions were taken. This contrasts with earlier vaccines like Rotashield®, which were removed after only 15 cases of intussusception:
- Regulatory Oversight Failures:
- The FDA and other global regulatory agencies overlooked or dismissed major concerns raised during the review process.
- Regulatory assessments relied on insufficient data and assumptions rather than rigorous scientific evidence.
- Call for a Moratorium:
- Based on incomplete data, serious safety concerns, and potential long-term risks, the authors recommend a moratorium on Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 modRNA vaccines.
- Proper studies must be conducted to ensure safety, as the responsibility lies with the pharmaceutical industry, not independent scientists.
Adverse Events and VAERS Reporting:
Since the proper conditions for market withdrawal have been met, the primary obstacle preventing an immediate moratorium on COVID-19 genetic injections is our captured regulatory agencies, which will hopefully be dealt with after the Senate confirmation process.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
www.mcculloughfnd.org
Original Article: Truth Warrior suggested
Truthful comments that add value to our readers, such as additional information, clarification, validation or worthy rebuttal will be posted. The goal of comments on articles is to gain additional truth.
Comments ()