The Body Snatchers: The NWO’s Eugenics Agenda

LewRockwell / Dr. Igor Shepherd

The body snatchers are here, and they are coming for you, me, and the rest of society—all under the guise that eugenics is necessary to contain scary viruses, end climate change, and protect the planet from pollution caused by overpopulation. We are entering a new world order where euthanasia, mandatory birth control, genetic screenings, genetic engineering, marriage restrictions, racial and mental health segregation, and abortions will be the new normal.

Eugenics is derived from ancient Greek and means “good genes,” which involves the practice of planned breeding in order to bring about better genetic traits for future populations. But to make a better race always involves elimination of those who do not have “good” genes.

What most people are not aware of is that the current ruling oligarchy follow a godless belief system called social Darwinism which they believe grants them the power to choose who lives and who dies. Legalizing eugenics allows these mad hatters to get away with mass murder.

The theory of social Darwinism promotes the belief that all species are related and gradually change over time through natural selection, which means that because of genetic variations certain individuals are born with greater genes, allowing them the rights to prevail over those bloodlines who are deemed less suitable. Charles Darwin’s premise that mankind evolved from earlier primates allows those who feel they are superior to drag the rest of the human race down to the level of animals, undermining natural law and contesting the long-held Biblical teachings that God created humans in His sacred image and likeness.

In 1859, Darwin published a daring book entitled, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Through Darwin’s philosophies social Darwinism took root and spread throughout the world, promoting the crude concept that only the “survival of the fittest,” those people who carry powerful positions in society, should be allowed to live and rule because they genetically evolved better than others. The rest of society are viewed as unfit, lazy and stupid, and this is why eugenics, racism, inequality and imperialism became a big part of the social Darwin thought-process.

This is why world leaders and members of the smokescreen organization, the World Economic Forum (WEF), have labeled themselves as the “elite” (survivors of the fittest) and propagate Darwinist theology in their writings and conferences. They are gung-ho in trying to condition the world to accept eugenics and the necessity of bulk depopulation.

In 2014, the 44^th annual WEF meeting held in Davos, Switzerland, was named “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for our Society, Politics and Business.” Microsoft nerd Bill Gates and global-warming guru, Al Gore, unmasked their radical thoughts on ridding the world of the “unfit.” Both men proposed that depopulation of the world was a necessary channel with which to end climate change, and that contraception was the key in making sure high climates did not harm the world. Gates blabbed that birth control was needed because too many people “generated” pollution, which in turn created abnormal changes in the weather.Boy, what a load of doo-doo. No wonder this guy was a Harvard dropout. He cannot differentiate between real science and science fiction.

The excrement does not end when it comes to propagating eugenics as something necessary to save the world from burn-everyone-alive out-of-control weather. A few years earlier, Professor Matthew Liao, from New York University, became peanut butter and jelly for the Darwinian mindset, and put out a research paper claiming human engineering and eugenics were necessary to put a lid on climate change. His bizarre suggestions included the following:

– Gene editing to create smaller-sized people so that people ate less food.

– Genetic modification to bring about night vision capabilities so that people used less energy.

– Utilizing various methods to generate a meat-intolerant population so that gas emissions would be lowered.

– Revise women’s cognitive abilities so that birth rates nose-dived.

– Convince populations into taking pro-social hormones so as to reset their brains and get them to collectively cooperate with the climate change agenda.

And if these human hijackers can collectively brainwash the masses to accept climate change through pro-social hormone treatments, you can imagine what other mind control horrors they have up their sleeves for the lazy and stupid populace.

Marketing the acceptance of eugenics through gene editing has been ongoing for quite a long time. This is why Harvard’s Professor Michael Sandel spoke at the University back in 2004, under the headline banner, “The New Eugenics? The Brave New World of Designer Children, Bionic Athletes, and Genetic Engineering.”

Sandal is a liberal political philosopher and professor for Harvard’s law school, and has no educational background in biology or medicine. And yet he was chosen to speak on the subject of genetic engineering. Could it possibly be because he promotes social Darwinism and is labeled as an anti-market Marxist? I think so.

Sandal’s presentation was meant to put eugenics in a positive light. He disputed those who viewed eugenics as being morally unethical, and assured the audience eugenics was not projects of control or instruments of ambition. He rationalized gene editing as a “gift” for mankind and proclaimed that society should be indebted to the new science because it created better humans. Like a binge eater, he vomited numerous excuses and skirted around the legal, ethical and moral aspects of genetic engineering. He insisted social solidarity and mutual responsibility condoned the altering of human genes and that birth control brought about the “fittest” of peoples.

He bragged that science already knew how to fashion a breed of stronger people, genetically enhance memories to eliminate Alzheimer’s, and create attractive designer babies. And as he puked out his propaganda, he willfully omitted the fact that those genetic breakthroughs only applied to the “survival of the fittest.” The belief of social Darwinism does not allow humans who are considered genetically inferior to have any choices over their lives or the lives of their offspring. The only ones who will be making the choices on who is allowed to be genetically enhanced will be the “elite” in power.

Social Darwinism and communism are attracted to each other like magnets. Both China and the Soviet Union governed under Darwinian principles. China, in fact, used extreme social Darwinism more than any other country to shape their culture. Starting in the 1930’s, Chinese physicians passed resolutions on birth control, and established eugenic laws on marriage, genetic isolation of races, and allowed sterilization. By 1980, they had instituted the one-child policy.

In 1921, the Soviets opened the first Bureau of Eugenics at the Russian Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg, which led to the opening of other eugenics organizations and genetic laboratories. Though the term social Darwinism was not outwardly expressed to the general public so as not to upend the mass worship of Marx and Lenin (the golden-boys of communism), the theory of social Darwinism was deeply embedded into Russian society, leaving citizens cold and unsympathetic to the needs of others. Mentally and physically disabled people, along with political dissenters, were quietly removed from society, and no one talked about it.

Social Darwinism justifies purging anyone who disagrees with ruling political views. In the Soviet era, political dissidents were considered mentally unstable and put into psychiatric wards. Chinese authorities imprisoned their insurgents. The ways of the Great Reset will do similar if it is allowed to gain ground. And once the new global government is in place, all holidays, religious faith and physical reminders of the past will be banned from society.

Eugenics Plan under the Global Elite

How advanced is the global “elite” with implementing justified eugenics? Let’s take a look. Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum website is chock-full of articles supporting the communist-creed of social Darwinism, and many WEF contributors are professors and lecturers from the Charles Darwin University located in Australia.

One particular contributor, Tim Brown, the CEO of global design company IDEO, wrote an article promoting eugenics in 2011 titled, “From Newton to Darwin.” His article reads the following:

As organizations of all sizes and forms grapple with the need for new levels of agility and innovation the leadership and organizational paradigms are changing. One might describe this as a shift from Newtonian thinking to Darwinian thinking…Instead of predictable, top-down, architected approaches to the future (the world of Newton) we are becoming more comfortable with a bottom-up, evolutionary, learn-as-you-go approach (the world of Darwin). While the analogy is not bullet-proof (we have the ability to add intelligent design to the survival-of-the-fittest of natural systems) it provides a useful framework for leadership behavior.

Mr. Brown believes that by adding intelligent design (gene-editing) to the “survival of the fittest” (Darwinian term) they can obtain smarter and brighter leaders for the future. And this is where CRISPR comes in and why two-faced Schwab and his Darth Vader’s have opened over 25 Fourth Industrial Revolution centers around the world (including one in San Francisco). These centers focus on genetically creating a new transhuman race of the “fittest.”

In Schwab’s books, The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution, he argues the following:

This fourth industrial revolution is different in scale, scope, and complexity from any that have come before, and will fundamentally alter how we live and work. Characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital, and biological worlds, the developments are affecting all disciplines, economies, industries, and governments and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.

Schwab is letting us know that under the Great Reset humanity will be genetically changed through manmade means, which in turn will affect how we live our lives. He is letting us know that in the near future the world’s population will no longer be human.

An article put out January 6^th, 2017, in the Guardian, by Steven Poole, titled, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution Review—Adapt to New Technology or Perish,” states that Schwab’s idea that we all must adapt to advanced technology is really a veiled ideology of social Darwinism—because the people who survive the coming robot deluge will by definition have been the “fittest” all along.

Schwab’s like-minded assistant, Professor Yuval Harari, confirmed his social Darwinist mentality through numerous speeches he gave for WEF, one in which he referred to people as “animals.” In a 2018 speech, he revealed the following:

“We are probably among the last generations of homo sapiens. Within a century or two, Earth will be dominated by entities that are more different from us, than we are different from Neanderthals or from chimpanzees. Because in the coming generations, we will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds.”

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is not about implants in brains or other advanced forms of artificial intelligence that connect humans to computers. No, the “elite’s” main targets are to use eugenics to eliminate the current “worthless” human race and replace it with their own lab-created genetically modified breed of superior transhuman beings. The Frankenstein’s of the Great Reset have already been in their labs for decades genetically engineering and designing this new obedient species.

Part of their creation will be non-binary species (to eliminate overpopulation), and this is why globalists have been promoting agender or gender-neutral terminology for many years. Google recently launched an “inclusive language” function on their search engine which is designed to do away with words that identify female from male. By the way, changing the sex of humans by genetically modifying the X and Y chromosomes is already a done deal, and producing a populace of non-genders is easily accomplished through mRNA mass vaccinations.

Eugenics of the Past

Many people believe that the Nazi’s were the first to implement Eugenics on their citizens, but this is not true. The USA was the first to allow compulsory sterilization in 32 states. Between 1909 and the early 1950’s, around 64,000 Americans were sterilized. These included people of color, unwed mothers, and the mentally challenged. California’s government institutions condoned sterilization on thousands of women simply for being “oversexed” or too “passionate.”

It was no coincidence that in 1902 eugenicist David Jordan, who was president of California’s Stanford University, wrote a book entitled: The Blood of the Nation: A Study in the Decay of Races by the Survival of the Unfit. His goal was to promote social Darwinism and expand eugenics as an acceptable practice—and it worked because California, just seven years later, implemented an aggressive sterilization program.

The US Supreme Court also endorsed the hate-mongering practice of eugenics. In the famous 1927 ruling of Buck v. Bell, which allowed states to forcibly sterilize citizens who were “feebleminded and socially inadequate,” Supreme Court Justice Oliver Holmes wrote the following horrendous statement:

“It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind….Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

No wonder, years later, at the end of WWII, the Nazi’s quoted Holmes’ pathetic words for their defense at the Nuremberg trials.

Under Hitler’s reign, Nazi-eugenics, otherwise tagged racial hygiene, was implemented to improve the biological makeup of the German people. Hitler researched (and greatly admired) the American Eugenics program. In his book, Mein Kampf, he writes:

“There is today one state in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States.”

Through selective breeding Fascists hoped to produce an “Aryan” race of tall-statured people with light skin and light eyes. Anyone the Nazi’s deemed unworthy for life were forced-sterilized. This included 400,000 homosexuals, transgenders, those with epilepsy, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, deafness and blindness.

Hitler’s Aktion T4 euthanasia program, which allowed German doctors to administer “mercy deaths” on whomever they deemed had an incurable illness, eliminated 300,000 psychiatric patients. The order sanctioned doctors to decide who would live or die, and murder whomever they decided was unfit for life, incurable disease or not.

America eventually barred sterilization programs in the psychiatric wards, and discrimination laws put a halt to men like Holmes from spewing their bigotries, but legalized eugenics continued under so-called non-profit healthcare organizations like Planned Parenthood, which advocates the butchering of human life. Through reverse psychology social Darwinists were able to trick the masses into endorsing eugenics and willingly and guiltlessly slaughter their own race of unborn babies—babies whom Gates, Gore, Sandel, Schwab, Harari and the rest of the “survival of the fittest” all consider unworthy for life.

The World Health Organization provided recent data that 1.2 million abortions were performed worldwide in 2021, in just the first ten days of the year! The roots of social Darwinism go deep, and if allowed to go deeper, extermination of human beings will become a customary part of life (for those who are not already eliminated).

Eugenics of the Present

The psychological acclimatization to get the public to accept and legalize eugenics and mass murder has been going on for decades, but the re-introduction of “acceptable” euthanasia into society happened shortly after world leaders staged a coronavirus pandemic and executed a coup against the basic rights of all peoples.

The Covid-19 pandemic, without a doubt, was a eugenics agenda put in place to legally eliminate those that the “elite” judged to be unsustainable for life, such as the disabled, elderly, and the general “unfit” populace who they believe create pollution. Using a non-existent coronavirus (and thus why the world’s mortality rates still remain at 0.1%), the globalists created enough fear to sway the public and healthcare workers to accept and participate in crimes against humanity.

Without any concern to the medical risks involved to sick and pregnant patients, or the dire concerns of family members, forced ventilation procedures were administered (this process usually kills more patients than it saves), dangerous drugs were prescribed, and risky mRNA vaccinations were dispensed (ill and immune-compromised patients should never be vaccinated). Corrupt doctors in leadership, like Anthony Fauci, ordered hospitals to collectively treat patients with varying respiratory illnesses under one set of “Covid” rules, effectively removing the rights of doctors to treat their patients as they saw fit. And since PCR tests provided false readings almost 100% of the time for the first two years of the pandemic (until CDC finally banned them), euthanasia advanced and deaths soared.

By April of 2022, 734,871 people, aged 65 to 85, had died in the US due to atrocious treatments and unsafe vaccinations. And to make matters worse, the “genetically-superior” kings in power stripped the dying seniors from their basic rights to die with dignity, and refused to allow family members into their rooms to say their last goodbyes. Isolation was never necessary because CDC documented that Covid-19 carried an approximate 99.8% survival rate, had symptoms similar to the flu, and was a mild virus. Hospitals were overreacting due to political pressure and could have easily provided family members with PPE (personal protective equipment) to ensure contagion did not happen.

Allowing citizens to die alone had nothing to do with a contagious virus, but everything to do with a quick elimination of the “unfit” and conditioning the masses and healthcare professionals to accept and endorse euthanasia (as what happened under Hitler’s orders). The “elite” knew that by keeping family members away, the likelihood of the patient’s health improving was slim, and that isolated deaths would become acceptable to the public. These cruel actions also set up citizens to accept isolation camps, and not question authorities when family members were force-removed from society.

Camps are already legalized and in place under CDC’s “shielding approach” strategy. Starting at age 65, individuals can be removed from their homes and families and put in camps even though they are not sick! This barbarism falsely categorizes all older people as weak and at high-risk for disease, even though many might be in perfect health.

This new regulation is equally as sinister as the Aktion T4 euthanasia order Hitler signed. This discriminatory decree will allow officials to snatch seniors, disabled, mentally challenged, and those who politically disagree with the new communist government—Chinese style—and do whatever they want with them in secret, whether that be slow imprisonment until death or swift elimination.

I was still on the Covid team and working for the Wyoming Public Health Department when “death panels” were introduced under what they characterized as crisis care standards. Our team was told that a panel of health officers, doctors, lawyers and chaplains would decide the fate of who lived and who died. I was already bothered by the push to mass-vaccinate the world with novel vaccines that held bioweapon capabilities, and so I questioned why “death panels” (and I used that term even though they did not) were being considered, especially when Wyoming had no medical surge present in any of the hospitals. I received no sensible answer. Other Republican-led states, like Texas, Arizona and Idaho were also promoting similar brutalities.

No matter what shrewd words Schwab and his looney henchmen use to try and con people that life under the Great Reset will be amazing if we just trust them to gene-hack our minds and bodies, the true hard fact is that their racist social Darwinist ideology promotes the extinction of all mankind and debases everything decent, moral and virtuous in life. By pretending that the Covid mRNA vaccines were about public safety, they sterilized and euthanized millions of people worldwide. The reported data of injured and dead (of all ages) proves these numbers, and Pfizer’s own research shows that 23 of 32 expectant mothers who received mRNA inoculations resulted in miscarriages or “spontaneous abortions,” with a 50 times surge in ectopic pregnancies, resulting in fetal death.

To reach the level of a perfect race—and ultimately immortality (which they believe they can achieve)—the unfit will have to go. And through psyops and distorted propaganda the body snatchers will convince the masses that eugenics, euthanasia and mass murder is compulsory for a squeaky-clean environment. Will humanity step in and stop the extinction of their own species, or allow it? Time will tell.

References:

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-history

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-06681-000

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/22/coronavirus-ventilators-survival/

https://guardian.ng/life/who-says-more-than-1-2-million-abortions-have-been-performed-in-2021/

https://www.rbth.com/history/334286-why-were-disabled-people-persecuted-ussr

https://www.globalresearch.ca/too-much-ignore-covid-vaccines-cause-16633-more-miscarriages-compared-flu-vaccines/5778078?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

https://www.globalresearch.ca/evidence-millions-deaths-serious-adverse-events-resulting-experimental-covid-19-injections/5763676

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/12/joseph-mercola/miscarriages-and-other-tragic-side-effects-of-the-mrna-shots/

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10749665/Google-goes-woke-Search-engine-launches-inclusive-language-function.html